FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180  
181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   >>   >|  
d to show by proof, that the conveyance was made in good faith and for a valuable consideration. In other states, the strict rule prevails, that, without a change of possession, the transaction is fraudulent _in law_; in which case the assignee, or person claiming the property under the assignment, is not permitted to show that, in point of _fact_, the transaction was _bona fide_, (in good faith.) Sec.5. The rule that holds every conveyance to be fraudulent unless the property immediately changes hands, often operates to inconvenience and even injury of honest debtors. A debtor may be obliged to part with property, however convenient or needful its present use may be to him, when, but for this stringent rule of law, he might borrow the money to pay a debt, or procure a postponement of payment, and retain the use of the property pledged. Sec.6. In many of the states, this perplexing question has been settled by statute. In the state of New-York, the law expressly declares, that a sale or an assignment without immediate delivery and a change of possession, shall be presumed to be fraudulent and void as against creditors, unless the party claiming the property under the assignment shall make it appear that the same was made in good faith, and without any attempt to defraud. Laws more or less similar to this, and securing to the assignor the use of the mortgaged property, are believed to exist in a majority of the states. The instruments conveying the property are usually called _chattel mortgages_, and are required to be recorded as deeds; in New-York, and perhaps a few other states, only filed in the town or county clerk's office. Sec.7. In the sale of personal property, though there should be a judgment against the vendor, and the purchaser should have notice of it, that fact would not of itself render the sale fraudulent. But if the purchaser, knowing of the judgment, purchases with the view or purpose to defeat the creditor's execution, the transaction is fraudulent. The question of fraud depends upon the motive. Sec.8. Assignments are sometimes made by debtors for the benefit of their creditors. A person deeply indebted, or in embarrassed circumstances, assigns his property, in trust, to one or more persons, who are to dispose of it, and to apply the avails to the payment of his creditors, or a part of them; for the law does not forbid a debtor's giving a preference to one or more creditors over others, provid
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180  
181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

property

 
fraudulent
 

states

 
creditors
 

transaction

 

assignment

 

debtor

 

question

 

purchaser

 

judgment


payment

 

debtors

 
conveyance
 

claiming

 

change

 

possession

 
person
 

preference

 
county
 

giving


forbid
 

office

 

personal

 

provid

 

called

 

conveying

 

instruments

 

believed

 

majority

 

chattel


mortgages

 

required

 

recorded

 
persons
 
Assignments
 

dispose

 

motive

 
benefit
 

circumstances

 

assigns


embarrassed

 

indebted

 

deeply

 

depends

 

render

 
notice
 

vendor

 
avails
 

knowing

 

creditor