FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  
except where the law of necessity or great political interests may render interference absolutely necessary. But I say that non-interference is the rule, and interference the exception. This is the ground of the policy on which this country acts. She disdains a daily interference with the affairs of other countries. _House of Lords, February 11, 1828._ * * * * * _No Personal or Political Hostility to Canning._ I rise to protest against any such imputation being cast upon me, as that I ever entertained any personal hostility to Mr. Canning. On a former occasion I stated distinctly to your lordships, why I did not think proper to remain in the government of which Mr. Canning was the head. The communications that passed between me and Mr. Canning have, unfortunately, I must be allowed to say, been made public enough, and I defy any man to point out anything like personal feelings in those communications. It is true, that when I found it necessary to withdraw from the government, I also thought it my duty to lay down the military office which I hold; but I beg leave to call your lordships' recollection to the explanation which I gave at that time, and to my subsequent conduct. After I left the government, I always met Mr. Canning in the way in which I had been accustomed to meet him, and did not depart from those habits which had marked our previous intercourse. But I will go further and say, that I had no hostility towards Mr. Canning's government. I did, it is true, propose that a clause should be added to the corn-bill, but did I not at the same time beg of the government to adopt that clause, or something like it, and not to abandon the bill? I must again repeat, that to the day of his death I felt no personal hostility to Mr. Canning; and that I am equally free from the imputation of having entertained any political hostility towards him. To whatever persons the declaration of the right honourable gentleman (Mr. Huskisson) was intended to apply.[9] I claim to myself the right of not being included in the number of Mr. Canning's enemies. [Footnote 9: Referring to an angry speech of that gentleman in the Commons.] _House of Lords, February 25, 1828._ * * * * * _Corn Law of 1828, Principle on which founded._ Your lordships are all aware that a variety of opinions exist throughout the country respecting the introduction of foreign corn; one c
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111  
112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Canning

 

government

 

hostility

 

interference

 
lordships
 

personal

 

clause

 

political

 

imputation

 

entertained


gentleman

 

country

 

communications

 
February
 
abandon
 
propose
 

foreign

 

accustomed

 

depart

 

habits


marked

 

intercourse

 

previous

 
respecting
 

enemies

 

Footnote

 
Referring
 
number
 

included

 
speech

Principle
 

founded

 
Commons
 

intended

 
variety
 

equally

 

introduction

 
declaration
 

honourable

 

Huskisson


opinions

 
persons
 

repeat

 

Personal

 
Political
 

Hostility

 

countries

 

affairs

 
protest
 

disdains