FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378  
379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   >>   >|  
, "History of the United States," VII, 392. [19] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 158-179. [20] _House Journal_, 1861, Governor's Message, p. 10. [21] Ibid., 11. [22] _House Journal_, 1861, Governor's Message, p. 12. [23] Ibid., 14. [24] Letter of John J. Crittenden to Gen. McClellan. [25] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 42. [26] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," p. 45. [27] _House Journal_. 1861, p. 33. [28] Ibid., 34. [29] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 57. [30] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 58-62. [31] Ibid., 58. [32] _House Journal_, 1861, p. 6. [33] Ibid., 94. [34] Nicolay and Hay, "Life of Lincoln," IV, 233. [35] Smith, "History of Kentucky," 610; Shaler, "History of Kentucky," 243. [36] Smith says in describing the period of 1861: "It were well nigh certain that if a sovereignty convention could have been called at any time before the formation of the Union sentiment and policy into action and life, the state would have been carried off into the act of secession as Virginia and Tennessee were by the sense of sympathy and kinship toward the South." Shaler thinks the same. He says: "There is reason to believe that this course (neutrality) was the only one that could have kept Kentucky from secession. If what had been unhappily named a Sovereignty Convention had been called in 1861; if the state had been compelled by the decision of a body of men who were acting under the control of no constitutional enunciation, the sense of sympathy and kinship with the Southern states, such as would easily grow up under popular oratory in a mob, would probably have precipitated action." Speed, however, is doubtless right in saying all this is mere assertion and that there was no danger of secession after the people had a chance to transfer their will to the government. Shaler, "Kentucky," p. 240; Smith, "History of Kentucky," p. 610. [37] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 93-98. [38] Collins, "History of Kentucky," I, 243. [39] _The Frankfort Commonwealth_, July 19; Aug. 19, 21, 23; Nov. 10, 20, 23; and Dec. 11, 1861; _The Yeoman Weekly_, May 10; June 21, 22; July 8, 1861; _Daily Louisville Democrat_, Sept. 7 and Oct. 8, 1861. [40] _House Journal_, 1861, 240. [41] Speed, "The Union Cause in Kentucky," 192. [42] War Records, Serial 108, p. 37; Serial 127, p. 234; Serial 110, pp. 44-64, and Serial 110, p. 71. [43] Nicolay and Hay, "Life of Lin
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378  
379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Kentucky

 
Journal
 
History
 

Serial

 

Shaler

 

secession

 

action

 

Nicolay

 
called
 

kinship


sympathy

 

Governor

 

Message

 

assertion

 

precipitated

 

doubtless

 

constitutional

 

enunciation

 

control

 

acting


Southern
 

popular

 
easily
 

states

 

oratory

 

Democrat

 

Frankfort

 

Louisville

 

Collins

 

Weekly


Commonwealth

 

chance

 

transfer

 
people
 

danger

 

Yeoman

 

government

 
Records
 

Tennessee

 

Lincoln


period

 

describing

 

United

 

States

 

Letter

 

McClellan

 

Crittenden

 

neutrality

 

reason

 

Convention