FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267  
268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>   >|  
before the statute of men! what Goliaths against the law of God! What capitalist heeds your statute of usury when he can get illegal interest? How many banks are content with _six per cent._ when money is scarce? Did you never hear of a merchant evading the duties of the custom-house? When a man's liberty is concerned, we must keep the law, must we? betray the wanderer, and expose the outcast?"[211] [Footnote 211: 2 Occasional Sermons, 256, 257, 258.] Gentlemen, you know what Mr. Commissioner Hallett said of such language, said at the Union Meeting in Faneuil Hall.[212] He was only fugitive slave bill commissioner then; in consequence of his denial of the Higher Law of God he is now fugitive slave bill Attorney. You know what Mr. Curtis said of the Sermon; now, in consequence he is Judge Curtis--the fugitive slave bill Judge. [Footnote 212: See above, p. 149.] On the 14th of October there was another meeting at Faneuil Hall--the Freesoilers came that time. The old flame of Liberty burnt anew in Charles Francis Adams, who presided. Perhaps some of you remember the prayer of the venerable Dr. Lowell which lifted up our souls to the "Father of all men!" I proposed the appointment of a "Committee of Vigilance and Safety to take such measures as they shall deem just and expedient to protect the colored people of this city in the enjoyment of their lives and liberties." I was appointed one of the Committee, and subsequently Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Vigilance Committee; a very responsible office, Gentlemen. At that meeting I told of a fugitive from Boston, who that day had telegraphed to his wife here, asking if it was safe for him to come back from Canada. I asked the meeting, "Will you let him come back; how many will defend him to the worst?" "Here a hand vote was taken," said the newspapers, "a forest of hands was held up." Surely that was "evincing an express liking" for an obstruction of the kidnappers. But did it violate the law of 1790? All this you might easily have known before. Here is something you did not know. That Meeting, its Resolutions, its Speeches, its Action, were brought up in the cabinet of the United States and discussed. _Mr. Webster_, then Secretary of State, _wished to have Mr. Adams, president of the meeting, presented to the grand-jury and indicted for treason_! But the majority thought otherwise. Gentlemen, when the kidnappers came
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267  
268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

meeting

 

fugitive

 
Committee
 

Gentlemen

 

kidnappers

 

Footnote

 

Meeting

 

Faneuil

 

Vigilance

 
consequence

Curtis
 

statute

 

defend

 
Canada
 
capitalist
 

telegraphed

 

liberties

 
appointed
 

enjoyment

 
colored

people

 
illegal
 
subsequently
 

Chairman

 

Boston

 

office

 
Executive
 

responsible

 

forest

 
States

discussed
 

Webster

 

Secretary

 

United

 

cabinet

 

Speeches

 

Action

 

brought

 

wished

 
treason

majority
 
thought
 

indicted

 

president

 

presented

 
Resolutions
 

Surely

 

evincing

 

express

 

liking