FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   >>  
illiams!_[224] [Footnote 224: Med Case, p. 25.] Gentlemen of the Jury, before you can convict me of the crime charged, you must ask three several sets of questions, and be satisfied of all these things which I will now set forth. I. THE QUESTION OF FACT. Did I do the deed charged, and obstruct Marshal Freeman while in the peace of the United States, and discharging his official duty? This is a quite complicated question. Here are the several parts of it:-- 1. Was there any illegal obstruction or opposition at all made to the Marshal? This is not clear. True, an attack was made on the doors and windows of the Court House, but that is not necessarily an attack on the Marshal or his premises. He has a right in certain rooms of the Court House, and this he has in virtue of a lease. He has also a right to use the passage-ways of the house, in common with other persons and the People in general. His rights as Tenant are subject to the terms of his lease and to the law which determines the relation of Tenant and Landlord. Marshal Freeman as tenant has no more rights than Freeman Marshal, or John Doe, or Rachel Roe would have under the same circumstances. Of course he had a legal right to defend himself if attacked, and to close his own doors, bar and fortify the premises he rented against the illegal violence of others. But neither his lease nor the laws of the land authorized him to close the other doors, or to obstruct the passages, no more than to obstruct the Square or the Street. No lease, no law gave him that right. Now there have been three secret examinations of witnesses relative to this assault, before three Grand-Juries. No evidence has been offered which shows _that any attack was made on the premises of the Marshal_. The Supreme Court of Massachusetts was in session at the moment the attack was made on the Court House; the venerable Chief Justice was on the Bench; the jury had retired to consider the capital case then pending, and were expected to return with their verdict. The People had a right in the court-room, a right in the passage-ways and doors which lead thither. That court had not ordered the room to be cleared or the doors to be shut. Marshal Freeman closed the outer doors of the Court House, and thus debarred men of their right to enter a Massachusetts Court of Justice solemnly deciding a capital case. You are to consider whether an attack on the outer doors of the Court House, is an illegal
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   >>  



Top keywords:

Marshal

 

attack

 
Freeman
 

premises

 

illegal

 

obstruct

 

Massachusetts

 

passage

 

Tenant

 
capital

Justice
 

rights

 

People

 
charged
 
defend
 

Street

 

attacked

 
violence
 

rented

 
authorized

passages

 
fortify
 
Square
 

assault

 

thither

 

ordered

 
cleared
 

verdict

 

expected

 
return

closed
 

deciding

 

solemnly

 

debarred

 

pending

 

Juries

 

evidence

 

relative

 

witnesses

 
secret

examinations
 
offered
 

retired

 

venerable

 

Supreme

 
session
 

moment

 

common

 

QUESTION

 

discharging