FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  
the Flood given us in the constellations. What evidence do they supply? Here the significant points are: the ship grounded upon a high rock; the raven above it, eating the flesh of a stretched-out reptile; a sacrifice offered up by a person, who has issued forth from the ship, upon an altar, whose smoke goes up in a cloud, in which a bow is set. In this grouping of pictures we have two characteristic features of the Priestly narrative, in the ship grounded on a rock, and in the bow set in the cloud; we have also two characteristic features of the Jehovistic narrative, in the smoking altar of sacrifice, and in the carrion bird. There is therefore manifest connection between the constellation grouping and _both_ the narratives given in Genesis. But the constellational picture story is the only one of all these narratives that we can date. It must have been designed--as we have seen--about 2700 B.C. The question again comes up for answer. Were the Genesis and Babylonian narratives, any or all of them, derived from the pictured story in the constellations; or, on the other hand, was this derived from any or all of them? The constellations were mapped out near the north latitude of 40 deg., far to the north of Babylonia, so the pictured story cannot have come from thence. We do not know where the Genesis narratives were written, but if the Flood of the constellations was pictured from them, then they must have been already united into the account that is now presented to us in Genesis, very early in the third millennium before Christ. Could the account in Genesis have been derived from the constellations? If it is a double account, most decidedly not; since the pictured story in the constellations is one, and presents impartially the characteristic features of _both_ the narratives. And (as in comparing the Genesis and the Babylonian narratives) we see that though the main circumstances are the same--in so far as they lend themselves to pictorial representations--the details, the presentment, the attitude are different. In the Genesis narrative, the bow set in the cloud is a rainbow in a cloud of rain; in the constellation picture, the bow set in the cloud is the bow of an archer, and the cloud is the pillar of smoke from off the altar of sacrifice. In the narratives of Genesis and Babylonia, Noah and Pir-napistim are men: no hint is given anywhere that by their physical form or constitution they were marked o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135  
136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Genesis

 

narratives

 

constellations

 

pictured

 
sacrifice
 
narrative
 

characteristic

 

features

 

derived

 

account


Babylonia

 

constellation

 

picture

 

Babylonian

 

grounded

 

grouping

 

united

 
millennium
 

presented

 

constitution


marked
 
written
 

physical

 

circumstances

 

comparing

 

impartially

 

presentment

 
details
 

pictorial

 

attitude


rainbow

 
double
 

representations

 
Christ
 

napistim

 

archer

 
presents
 
decidedly
 

pillar

 

issued


pictures

 

Priestly

 

carrion

 

smoking

 

Jehovistic

 

person

 
significant
 

points

 
supply
 

evidence