FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  
affairs of individual citizens--or in the legitimate governmental activities of the individual states which became members of the federal union. Hence, states could join the federal union without sacrificing the freedom of their citizens. Modern "liberalism" which has been continuously in control of the federal government (and of most opinion-forming institutions and media throughout our society) since Franklin D. Roosevelt's first inauguration, March 4, 1933, has, by ignoring constitutional restraints, changed our _Federal_ government with _limited_ powers into a _Central_ government with _limitless_ power over the individual states and their people. Modern "liberalism" has abandoned American constitutional government and replaced it with democratic centralism, which, in _fundamental theory, is identical_ with the democratic centralism of the Soviet Union, and of every other major nation existing today. It was possible to enlarge the size of the old American federal union without diminishing freedom for the people. When you enlarge the land area and population controlled by democratic centralism you must necessarily diminish freedom for the people, because the problems of centralized government increase with the size of population and area which it controls. * * * * * Look at what has happened to America since our _federal_ government was converted into a centralized absolutism. The central government in Washington arrogated to itself the unconstitutional power and responsibility of regulating the relationships between private employers and their employees, enacting laws which established "collective bargaining" as "national policy," and which, to that end, gave international unions a virtual monopoly over large segments of the labor market. It follows that a minor labor dispute between two unions on the waterfront of New York is no longer a concern only of the people and police in that neighborhood. A handful of union members who have no grievance whatever against their employers but who are in a jurisdictional struggle with another union, can shut down the greatest railroad systems in the world, throw thousands out of work, and paralyze vital transportation for business firms and millions of citizens all over the nation. Harry Bridges on the West Coast can order a political demonstration having nothing to do with "labor" matters, and paralyze the economy of half the n
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106  
107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

government

 

federal

 

people

 
individual
 

freedom

 

states

 

citizens

 

centralism

 
democratic
 

constitutional


population

 
American
 

enlarge

 
employers
 

centralized

 

nation

 

Modern

 
unions
 

members

 

paralyze


liberalism

 
policy
 

bargaining

 

national

 

longer

 

concern

 
employees
 

enacting

 
established
 

collective


segments

 

market

 

dispute

 

waterfront

 
monopoly
 
international
 
virtual
 

Bridges

 

millions

 

transportation


business

 

matters

 
economy
 

political

 

demonstration

 

grievance

 
handful
 

police

 

neighborhood

 

jurisdictional