FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  
ch they are not prepared to sustain or even understand. * * * * * The basic argument for foreign aid is that by helping the underdeveloped nations develop, we will keep them from falling under the dictatorship of communism. The argument is false and unsound, historically, politically, economically, and morally. The communists have never subjugated a nation by winning the loyalties of the oppressed and downtrodden. The communists first win the support of liberal-intellectuals, and then use them to subvert and pervert all established mores and ideals and social and political arrangements. Our foreign aid does not finance freedom in foreign lands; it finances socialism; and a world socialist system is what communists are trying to establish. As early as 1921, Joseph Stalin said that the advanced western nations must give economic aid to other nations in order to socialize their economies and prepare them for integration in the communist's world socialist system. Socializing the economies of all nations so that all can be merged into a one-world system was the objective of Colonel Edward M. House, who founded the Council on Foreign Relations, and has been the objective of the Council, and of all its associated organizations, from the beginning. Chapter 9 MORE OF THE INTERLOCK It is impossible in this volume to discuss all organizations interlocked with the Council on Foreign Relations. In previous chapters, I have discussed some of the most powerful agencies in the interlock. In this chapter, I present brief discussions of a few organizations which make significant contributions to the over-all program of the Council. INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN STRATEGY There are some men in the Council on Foreign Relations who condemn the _consequences_ of the CFR's policies--but who never mention the CFR as responsible for those policies, and who never really suggest any change in the policies. Frank R. Barnett is such a man. Mr. Barnett, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is research director for the Richardson Foundation and also program director for the Institute for American Strategy, which is largely financed by the Richardson Foundation. The Institute for American Strategy holds two-day regional "Strategy Seminars" in cities throughout the United States. Participants in the seminars are carefully selected civic and community leaders. The announced official pur
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125  
126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Council
 

nations

 

Relations

 

Foreign

 

system

 

communists

 
policies
 
Strategy
 

foreign

 
organizations

Richardson

 

director

 
Foundation
 

argument

 

Barnett

 

economies

 

objective

 

socialist

 
Institute
 
program

American

 

present

 
Chapter
 
discussions
 

beginning

 

chapter

 

significant

 
contributions
 

previous

 

impossible


volume

 

discuss

 

INTERLOCK

 

interlocked

 
powerful
 

agencies

 
discussed
 

chapters

 
interlock
 

Seminars


cities

 

United

 

regional

 
largely
 

financed

 

States

 

Participants

 

leaders

 

announced

 
official