FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  
he wisdom of the convention, is the most practical step. "That the findings of the delegates could be only recommendations, later to be accepted or rejected by their legislatures and their fellow citizens." * * * * * The NATO Citizens Commission Law of 1960 fully carries out the purposes and intent of the new Atlantic Union strategy fabricated in 1959 to replace the old Resolution which had failed for ten years. The roll-call vote on this law (published in the February 27, 1961, issue of _The Dan Smoot Report_) shows what a powerful array of United States Congressmen and Senators are for this step toward world government. The debates in House and Senate (Senate: _Congressional Record_, June 15, 1960, pp. 11724 _ff_; House: _Congressional Record_, August 24, 1960, pp. 16261 _ff_) show something even more significant. While denying that the NATO Citizens Commission Law had any relation to the old Atlantic Union Resolution which Congress had refused for ten years to consider, "liberals" in both Senate and House used language right out of the Atlantic Union Committee pamphlet of 1959 (_Our Best Hope ..._) to "prove" that this NATO Citizens Commission proposal was not dangerous: They argued, for example, that Commission members would be free to act in accordance with their own individual consciences; that the meetings of the Commission would be purely exploratory, and that Commission findings would be "only recommendations," not binding on the U.S. government. Congressional "liberals" supporting the NATO Citizens Commission also tried to establish the respectability of the Commission by arguing that it was merely being created to explore means of implementing Article 2 of the NATO Treaty. Are these "liberal" congressmen and senators so ignorant that they do not know the whole Atlantic Union movement is built under the canopy of "implementing Article 2 of this NATO Treaty?" Or, are they too stupid to understand this? Or, are they so dishonest that they distort the facts, thinking that the public is too confused or ignorant to discover the truth? Although the liberals in Congress loudly denied that the NATO Citizens Commission Law of 1960 had anything to do with Atlantic Union, Clarence Streit knew better--or was more honest. As soon as the law was passed, Streit began a hasty revision of his old _Union Now_. Early in 1961, Harper & Brothers published the rev
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Commission

 
Citizens
 

Atlantic

 

liberals

 

Congressional

 

Senate

 

Resolution

 

Congress

 

published

 

Treaty


ignorant

 

findings

 

Record

 

recommendations

 

government

 

Article

 

implementing

 

Streit

 

congressmen

 

liberal


arguing

 

purely

 

exploratory

 

binding

 

meetings

 

consciences

 

accordance

 

individual

 

supporting

 

created


explore

 

respectability

 
establish
 
distort
 

honest

 

Clarence

 

passed

 

Harper

 

Brothers

 

revision


denied

 

loudly

 

canopy

 

stupid

 

understand

 

movement

 

dishonest

 

discover

 

Although

 
confused