FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  
supposed, a strong leverage, by which our Government could be coerced, as it had been in 1854, into reciprocity of trade upon other products. It was to be a series of moral coercions, either accomplished or attempted. Coerced into accepting Mr. Delfosse as third Commissioner, we were now to be coerced into a commercial treaty for the benefit of Canada in order to escape the possible award on the fisheries. What the British Government desired was substantially a renewal of the Reciprocity treaty of 1854,--fishery clauses included. That treaty had expired in 1866; and to aid in securing its renewal a highly intelligent special Commissioner, Mr. Rothery, was now sent to Washington to aid the British Legation in negotiating such a convention. Success was more easily attained with the Executive department of our Government than with the Legislative. A treaty of reciprocity was agreed upon between Mr. Fish and Sir Edward Thornton, and duly transmitted to the Senate. If ratified by that body, it would still be incomplete until the consent of the House should be obtained. But it was rejected by the Senate on the 3d of February, 1875; and the two Governments were left to renew the arrangements for the Fishery Commission, which by agreement had not been affected by the postponement resulting from the negotiations for reciprocity. Various delays hindered the agreement between the two Governments upon an identic note to be addressed to the Austrian Government, requesting the appointment of the third Commissioner by the representative of that Government in London; and it was not accomplished until the winter of 1876-77. Mr. Fish realized by that time that he no longer had the power to prevent the selection of Mr. Delfosse, and that his selection, made against open and avowed opposition, might be especially detrimental to the interests of the United States. Mr. Fish realized also that Count von Beust, the Austrian Ambassador, might select some one even more objectionable than Mr. Delfosse, if that were possible; and he therefore thought it expedient to withdraw his personal objections to that gentleman, and agree to that which he could not change or avert. Upon intimations to that effect Count von Beust named Mr. Delfosse as the third Commissioner. The Canadian Government, whose interests and influence in the matter had been apparently consulted by Lord Granville at every step, and which had been represented as object
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673  
674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Government

 

treaty

 

Delfosse

 

Commissioner

 

reciprocity

 

realized

 

British

 

renewal

 

interests

 

selection


Senate

 

Austrian

 
coerced
 

accomplished

 

agreement

 
Governments
 

delays

 

Various

 

resulting

 
hindered

negotiations

 

avowed

 

winter

 

requesting

 
appointment
 

London

 

addressed

 
representative
 

prevent

 

longer


identic

 

thought

 
Canadian
 

influence

 

effect

 

intimations

 

matter

 
apparently
 
represented
 

object


consulted

 

Granville

 

change

 

Ambassador

 

select

 

States

 

detrimental

 
United
 

objectionable

 

personal