FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675  
676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   >>   >|  
borately prepared and ably argued on both sides. Reduced to its most simple statement, the contention of the United States Government was this: that the duty of the Commission was limited; that it was charged with the decision of no political or diplomatic questions; that all such questions had been determined by the high contracting parties in signing the treaty of Washington; and that this Commission was simply a reference for an accounting in a given department of trade. They contended that the value of the inshore fisheries was simply their value as mackerel fisheries; that to estimate one-fourth of the whole mackerel-catch as taken by American fishermen was a liberal, even an extravagant concession on the part of the United States; and that the remission of duty on Colonial fish and fish-oil, which was admitted to be worth $350,000 per annum to the Dominion of Canada, was an ample equivalent. In presenting the British case every consideration was put forward by the clever men who represented it, to magnify the concession made to the United States. They dwelt at great length upon the thousands of miles of coast thrown open to Americans; upon the fabulous wealth of the fisheries, where every one caught had, like the fish of the miracle in Scripture, a bit of money in its mouth; upon the fact that the chief resource and variety of fishing lay within the three-mile limit. They managed to obscure the real issue by great masses of confused statistics, and caused the sparsely settled provinces to appear as granting an extraordinary privilege to American fishermen, in allowing their nets to be dried and their fish to be cured on the sands and rocks of their remote and uninhabited coasts. After the respective cases had been stated and all the evidence and arguments heard it was found that the difference of opinion between the British and the United-States Commissioners were irreconcilable. The decision was therefore left to Mr. Delfosse--as was anticipated from the first. He estimated the superior advantage of the privilege of the inshore Colonial fisheries, over such as were given to British subjects in American waters, at $5,500,000 for their twelve years' use. The result of the negotiation, therefore, was that for twelve years' use of the inshore British Colonial fisheries which were ours absolutely by the treaty of 1782, we paid to the British Government the award of $5,500,000, and remitted duties to the amount
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675  
676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

fisheries

 

British

 

United

 

States

 

inshore

 

American

 

Colonial

 

privilege

 

Government

 

Commission


concession

 

fishermen

 
mackerel
 

treaty

 

simply

 
questions
 

twelve

 

decision

 

amount

 
provinces

remote

 

allowing

 

extraordinary

 

granting

 
confused
 

fishing

 

resource

 
variety
 

managed

 

obscure


statistics

 

caused

 
sparsely
 

uninhabited

 

masses

 

settled

 

anticipated

 
Delfosse
 
remitted
 

subjects


waters

 

advantage

 

superior

 

estimated

 

duties

 

stated

 

evidence

 
arguments
 

negotiation

 

respective