FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705  
706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   >>   >|  
dly developed in both States. In New York the _Tribune_, the _Albany Journal_, the _Utica Herald_ and other influential papers led an earnest protest and opposition. In Pennsylvania the _Philadelphia Press_, through the zeal of its chief proprietor, Mr. Calvin Wells, a leading iron-manufacturer of Pittsburg, seconded by other strong journals, gave voice to the decided and growing public feeling against acquiescing in any attempt to prevent a perfectly free representation. In the North-West the _Chicago Tribune_, and in the middle West the _Cincinnati Commercial_, not only resisted the mode of electing delegates in the large States but directly and vigorously assailed the policy of presenting General Grant for a third term. In the midst of this popular discussion came explicit declarations from individual delegates in both States that they would not be bound by any unit rule and should represent the will of their immediate constituencies. William H. Roberson was the first in New York to make public announcement of this purpose, and James McManes of Philadelphia led the movement in Pennsylvania. The opposition spread to other States that had not yet held their conventions, in many of which the prevailing methods of party action permitted more freedom. One of the last States to act was Illinois, and her Convention became the arena of a stormy contest. The majority in that body assumed authority to elect all the National delegates without regard to the voice or vote of Congressional districts; and after a long and stubborn struggle it named a complete delegation, overriding in nine of the districts the duly accredited choice of a clear majority of the undisputed local representatives in each district. This proceeding was justified on the one hand as only the exercise of the supreme power of the State Convention, and condemned on the other as trampling on the right of district representation; and thus the issue in its most distinct form was brought before the National Tribunal for settlement. A large concourse of delegates and other active Republicans gathered in Chicago in advance of the time appointed for the National Convention. The assemblage is memorable in political annals for its large number of able men, for its brilliant displays of oratory, for its long duration, and for its arduous struggle. From the United States Senate came Mr. Conkling, General Logan, George F. Hoar, J. Donald Cameron, Preston B.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705  
706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

delegates

 

Convention

 

National

 

public

 

district

 

struggle

 

Pennsylvania

 

Philadelphia

 

opposition


representation

 

Tribune

 
majority
 

Chicago

 

General

 
districts
 

proceeding

 

justified

 

representatives

 
choice

undisputed

 

accredited

 

stubborn

 

assumed

 
authority
 

contest

 

stormy

 
Preston
 

complete

 

delegation


Congressional

 

regard

 
overriding
 

condemned

 

political

 

memorable

 

annals

 
number
 
assemblage
 

advance


appointed

 

United

 

Senate

 

Conkling

 

arduous

 

George

 

brilliant

 
displays
 

oratory

 

duration