FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172  
173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>  
We now have _I_ and _A_ "asserting". Does this leave us free to make what supposition we choose as to _E_? My answer is "No. We are tied down to the supposition that _E_ does _not_ assert." This can be proved as follows:-- If possible, let _E_ "assert". Then (taking x, y, and z to represent Attributes) we see that, if the Proposition "No xy are z" be true, some things exist with the Attributes x and y: i.e. "Some x are y." pg167 Also we know that, if the Proposition "Some xy are z" be true, the same result follows. But these two Propositions are Contradictories, so that one or other of them _must_ be true. Hence this result is _always_ true: i.e. the Proposition "Some x are y" is _always_ true! _Quod est absurdum._ (See Note (A), p. 195). We see, then, that the supposition "_I_ asserts" necessarily leads to "_A_ asserts, but _E_ does not". And this is the _first_ of the various views that may conceivably be held. Next, let us suppose that _I_ does _not_ "assert." And, along with this, let us take the supposition that _E_ _does_ "assert." Hence the Proposition "No x are y" means "Some x exist, and none of them are y": i.e. "_all_ of them are _not_-y," which is a Proposition in _A_. We also know, of course, that the Proposition "All x are not-y" proves "No x are y." Now two Propositions, each of which proves the other, are _equivalent_. Hence every Proposition in _A_ is equivalent to one in _E_, and therefore "_asserts_". Hence our _second_ conceivable view is "_E_ and _A_ assert, but _I_ does not." This view does not seen to involve any necessary contradiction with itself or with the accepted facts of Logic. But, when we come to _test_ it, as applied to the actual _facts_ of life, we shall find I think, that it fits in with them so badly that its adoption would be, to say the least of it, singularly inconvenient for ordinary folk. Let me record a little dialogue I have just held with my friend Jones, who is trying to form a new Club, to be regulated on strictly _Logical_ principles. _Author._ "Well, Jones! Have you got your new Club started yet?" _Jones_ (_rubbing his hands_). "You'll be glad to hear that some of the Members (mind, I only say '_some_') are millionaires! Rolling in gold, my boy!" _Author._ "That sounds well. And how many Members have entered?" _Jones_ (_staring_). "None at all. We haven't got it started yet
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172  
173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   >>  



Top keywords:

Proposition

 

assert

 
supposition
 

asserts

 

Propositions

 
proves
 

Author

 

started

 

result


Attributes

 

Members

 

equivalent

 
adoption
 

friend

 
record
 
ordinary
 
dialogue
 

singularly


inconvenient

 

sounds

 

Rolling

 

millionaires

 
staring
 

entered

 

Logical

 

principles

 
strictly

regulated

 

actual

 

rubbing

 

things

 

taking

 

represent

 

Contradictories

 

absurdum

 

asserting


choose

 
proved
 

answer

 

necessarily

 

conceivable

 

involve

 
accepted
 
contradiction
 

conceivably


suppose

 

applied