FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
er originally appeared, it formed the text for an editorial article in the _Daily News_, in which Mr. Andrew Lang's sign manual was not to be mistaken. Mr. Lang brought my somewhat desultory discussion very neatly to a point. He admitted that we habitually use "Americanism" as a term of reproach; "but," he asked, "who is reproached? Not the American (who may do as he pleases) but the English writer, who, in serious work, introduces, needlessly, an American phrase into our literature. We say 'needlessly' when our language already possesses a consecrated equivalent for the word or idiom." In the first place, one has to remark that many English critics are far from accepting Mr. Lang's principle that "the American may do as he pleases, of course." Mr. Lang himself scarcely acts up to it in this very article. And, for my part, I think the principle a false one. I think the English language has been entrusted to the care of all of us, English no less than Americans, Americans no less than English; and if I find an American writer debasing it in an essential point, as opposed to a point of mere local predilection, I assert my right to remonstrate with him, just as I admit his right, under similar circumstances, to remonstrate with me. It is not here, however, that I join issue with Mr. Lang: it is on his theory that an English writer necessarily does wrong who unnecessarily employs an Americanism. This is a question of great practical moment, and I am glad that Mr. Lang has stated it in this definite form. My view is perhaps sufficiently indicated above, but I take the opportunity of reasserting it with all deliberation. I believe that, as a matter both of literary and of social policy, we ought to encourage the free infiltration of graphic and racy Americanisms into our vernacular, and of vigorous and useful Americanisms (even if not absolutely necessary) into our literary language. Where is the harm in duplicating terms, if only the duplicates be in themselves good terms? For instance, take the word "fall." Mr. Brander Matthews writes: "An American with a sense of the poetic cannot but prefer to the imported word 'autumn' the native and more logical word 'fall,' which the British have strangely suffered to drop into disuse." Well, "autumn" was a sufficiently early importation. "Our ancestors," wrote Lowell (quoted by Mr. Matthews in the same article), "unhappily could bring over no English better than Shakespeare's;" an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:
English
 

American

 

language

 

writer

 

article

 
needlessly
 
pleases
 

Americans

 
remonstrate
 

sufficiently


literary

 

principle

 
Americanisms
 

Matthews

 
Americanism
 

autumn

 
opportunity
 
matter
 

reasserting

 

deliberation


quoted

 

policy

 

encourage

 

social

 

unhappily

 

Lowell

 

moment

 

stated

 

practical

 

employs


question

 
definite
 

ancestors

 

Shakespeare

 

infiltration

 
strangely
 

unnecessarily

 
writes
 

Brander

 
instance

suffered
 

logical

 
native
 
imported
 

prefer

 

poetic

 
British
 

duplicates

 
vernacular
 

vigorous