FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
d in Shakespeare's (and Chaucer's) English they brought over "autumn." The word has inherent beauty as well as splendid poetical associations. I doubt whether even Shakespeare could have made out of "fall" so beautiful a line as "The teeming autumn, big with rich increase." I doubt whether Keats, had he written an _Ode to the Fall_, would have produced quite such a miraculous poem as that which begins "Season of mists and mellow fruitfulness." Still, Mr. Matthews is quite right in saying that "fall" has a poetic value, a suggestion, an atmosphere of its own. I wonder, with him, why we dropped it, and I see no smallest reason why we should not recover it. The British literary patriotism which makes a point of never saying "fall" seems to me just as mistaken as the American literary patriotism (if such there be) that makes a merit of never saying "autumn." By insisting on such localisms (for the exclusive preference for either term is nothing more) we might, in process of time, bring about a serious fissure in the language. Of course there is no reason why Mr. Lang should force himself to use a word that is uncongenial to him; but if "fall" is congenial to me, I think I ought to be allowed to use it "without fear and without reproach." Take, now, a colloquialism. How formal and colourless is the English phrase "I have enjoyed myself!" beside the American "I have had a good time!" Each has its uses, no doubt. I am far from suggesting that the one should drive out the other. It is precisely the advantage of our linguistic position that it so enormously enlarges the stock of semi-synonyms at our disposal. To reject a forcible Americanism merely because we could, at a pinch, get on without it, is--Mr. Lang will understand the forcible Scotticism--to "sin our mercies." Mr. Lang is under a certain illusion, I think, in his belief that in hardening our hearts against Americanism's we should raise no barrier between ourselves and the classical authors of America. He says: "Let us remark that they [Americanisms] do not occur in Hawthorne, Poe, Lowell, Longfellow, Prescott, and Emerson, except when these writers are consciously reproducing conversations in dialect." He made the same remark on a previous occasion; when his opponent (see the _Academy_, March 30, 1895) opened a volume of Hawthorne and a volume of Emerson, and in five minutes found in Hawthorne "He had named his two children, one _for_ Her Majesty and o
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:
autumn
 

Hawthorne

 

Emerson

 
Americanism
 

forcible

 

reason

 

patriotism

 

literary

 

American

 

remark


English

 
volume
 

Shakespeare

 
mercies
 
illusion
 

hardening

 

belief

 

suggesting

 

precisely

 

synonyms


disposal

 

position

 

linguistic

 

reject

 

Scotticism

 
enormously
 

understand

 

enlarges

 

advantage

 

opponent


Academy

 

occasion

 
previous
 

reproducing

 

conversations

 

dialect

 

opened

 

children

 

Majesty

 

minutes


consciously
 
authors
 

America

 

classical

 

barrier

 
Americanisms
 

Prescott

 
writers
 
Longfellow
 

Lowell