FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709  
710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   >>   >|  
e latter is very far from resting solely on the practice of a particular sect; though this, if they would forbear to corrupt the pronoun while they simplify the verb, would deserve much more consideration than has ever been allowed it. Which of these modes of address is the more grammatical, it is useless to dispute; since fashion rules the one, and a scruple of conscience is sometimes alleged for the other. A candid critic will consequently allow all to take their choice. It is enough for him, if he can demonstrate to the candid inquirer, what phraseology is in any view allowable, and what is for any good reason reprehensible. That the use of the plural for the singular is ungrammatical, it is neither discreet nor available to affirm; yet, surely, it did not originate in any regard to grammar rules. Murray the schoolmaster, whose English Grammar appeared some years before that of Lindley Murray, speaks of it as follows: "_Thou_, the second person singular, though _strictly grammatical_, is seldom used, except in addresses to God, in poetry, and by the people called Quakers. In all other cases, a _fondness for foreign manners_,[242] and the power of custom, have given a sanction to the use of _you_, for the second person singular, though _contrary to grammar_,[243] and attended with this particular inconveniency, that a plural verb must be used to agree with the pronoun in number, and both applied to a _single person_; as, _you are_, or _you were_,--not _you wast_, or _you was_."--_Third Edition_, Lond., 1793, p. 34. This author everywhere exhibits the auxiliaries, _mayst, mightst, couldst, wouldst_, and _shouldst_, as words of one syllable; and also observes, in a marginal note, "Some writers begin to say, '_Thou may, thou might_,' &c."--_Ib._, p. 36. Examples of this are not very uncommon: "Thou _shall_ want ere I want."--_Old Motto; Scott's Lay_, Note 1st to Canto 3. "Thyself the mournful tale _shall_ tell."--_Felton's Gram._, p. 20. "One sole condition would I dare suggest, That _thou would save_ me from my own request."--_Jane Taylor_. OBS. 13.--In respect to the second person singular, the grammar of Lindley Murray makes no distinction between the solemn and the familiar style; recognizes in no way the fashionable substitution of _you_ for _thou_; and, so far as I perceive, takes it for granted, that every one who pretends to speak or write grammatically, must always, in addressing an individual, employ t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709  
710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
singular
 

person

 

grammar

 

Murray

 

candid

 

Lindley

 
plural
 
grammatical
 

pronoun

 
marginal

observes

 

writers

 
grammatically
 

addressing

 

Examples

 

shouldst

 

Edition

 

individual

 
employ
 
couldst

wouldst

 

mightst

 
author
 
exhibits
 

auxiliaries

 

syllable

 

uncommon

 
suggest
 

recognizes

 

condition


request

 

respect

 

distinction

 

Taylor

 
familiar
 

solemn

 
Felton
 

granted

 
perceive
 

fashionable


single

 

mournful

 

Thyself

 
substitution
 

pretends

 

called

 

critic

 

alleged

 

fashion

 
scruple