FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745  
746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   >>   >|  
sive of insurrections, and would readily exempt the other States from the obligation to protect the Southern against them. Religion and humanity had nothing to do with this question. Interest alone is the governing principle with nations. The true question at present is, whether the Southern States shall or shall not be parties to the Union. If the Northern States consult their interest, they will not oppose the increase of slaves, which will increase the commodities of which they will become the carriers. Mr. ELLSWORTH was for leaving the clause as it stands. Let every State import what it pleases. The morality or wisdom of slavery are considerations belonging to the States themselves. What enriches a part enriches the whole, and the States are the best judges of their particular interest. The Old Confederation had not meddled with this point; and he did not see any greater necessity for bringing it within the policy of the new one. Mr. PINCKNEY. South Carolina can never receive the plan if it prohibits the slave trade. In every proposed extension of the powers of Congress, that State has expressly and watchfully excepted that of meddling with the importation of negroes. If the States be all left at liberty on this subject, South Carolina may perhaps, by degrees, do of herself what is wished, as Virginia and Maryland already have done. Adjourned.--_pp_. 1388-9. WEDNESDAY, August 22, 1787. _In Convention_,--Article 7, Section 4, was resumed. Mr. SHERMAN was for leaving the clause as it stands. He disapproved of the slave trade; yet as the States were now possessed of the right to import slaves, as the public good did not require it to be taken from them, and as it was expedient to have as few objections as possible to the proposed scheme of government, he thought it best to leave the matter as we find it. He observed that the abolition of slavery seemed to be going on in the United States, and that the good sense of the several States would probably by degrees complete it. He urged on the Convention the necessity of despatching its business. Col. MASON. This infernal traffic originated in the avarice of British merchants. The British Government constantly checked the attempts of Virginia to put a stop to it. The present question concerns not the importing States alone, but the whole Union. The evil of having slaves was experienced during the late war. Had slaves been treated as they might have been by the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745  
746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   755   756   757   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 
slaves
 

question

 

stands

 

proposed

 

leaving

 

Virginia

 
degrees
 

Convention

 

clause


import

 
Carolina
 

slavery

 

enriches

 

necessity

 
Southern
 

present

 
increase
 
British
 

interest


public

 

objections

 

possessed

 

expedient

 
require
 

experienced

 

treated

 

August

 

WEDNESDAY

 

Article


SHERMAN

 
disapproved
 

resumed

 

Section

 

business

 

despatching

 

attempts

 

complete

 

checked

 
traffic

originated

 

avarice

 

infernal

 

merchants

 

constantly

 

Government

 

observed

 
matter
 

scheme

 

government