FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729  
730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   >>   >|  
es are not represented in the States to which they belong, why should they be represented in the General Government. What is the true principle of representation? It is an expedient by which an assembly of certain individuals, chosen by the people, is substituted in place of the inconvenient meeting of the people themselves. If such a meeting of the people was actually to take place, would the slaves vote? They would not. Why then should they be represented? He was also against such an indirect encouragement of the slave trade; observing that Congress, in their act relating to the change of the eighth article of Confederation, had been ashamed to use the term "slaves," and had substituted a description. Mr. MADISON reminded Mr. PATTERSON that his doctrine of representation, which was in its principle the genuine one, must for ever silence the pretensions of the small States to an equality of votes with the large ones. They ought to vote in the same proportion in which their citizens would do, if the people of all the States were collectively met. He suggested, as a proper ground of compromise, that in the first branch the States should be represented according to their number of free inhabitants; and in the second, which had for one of its primary objects the guardianship of property, according to the whole number, including slaves. Mr. BUTLER urged warmly the justice and necessity of regarding wealth in the apportionment of representation. Mr. KING had always expected, that, as the Southern States are the richest, they would not league themselves with the Northern, unless some respect were paid to their superior wealth. If the latter expect those preferential distinctions in commerce, and other advantages which they will derive from the connexion, they must not expect to receive them without allowing some advantages in return. Eleven out of thirteen of the States had agreed to consider slaves in the apportionment of taxation; and taxation and representation ought to go together.--_pp_. 1054-5-6. TUESDAY, July 10, 1787. _In Convention_,--Mr. KING reported, from the Committee yesterday appointed, "that the States at the first meeting of the General Legislature, should be represented by sixty-five members, in the following proportions, to wit:--New Hampshire, by 3; Massachusetts, 8; Rhode Island, 1; Connecticut, 5; New York, 6; New Jersey, 4; Pennsylvania, 8; Delaware, 1; Maryland, 6; Virginia, 10; North Ca
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   729  
730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741   742   743   744   745   746   747   748   749   750   751   752   753   754   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
States
 
represented
 

representation

 

slaves

 

people

 

meeting

 

number

 
expect
 

wealth

 

advantages


apportionment

 
General
 

principle

 

taxation

 

substituted

 
Eleven
 

connexion

 
allowing
 
return
 

receive


respect

 

superior

 

Northern

 

Southern

 
league
 

expected

 

commerce

 

distinctions

 

richest

 

preferential


derive

 
yesterday
 

Massachusetts

 

Island

 

Hampshire

 

proportions

 

Connecticut

 

Virginia

 

Maryland

 
Delaware

Jersey

 

Pennsylvania

 

members

 

TUESDAY

 

agreed

 

Legislature

 

appointed

 
Committee
 

Convention

 

reported