FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  
ality or Inequality. But both lay stress upon Coexistence and Succession, and we shall find that the distinctions between Simple Sequence and Causal Sequence, and between Repeated and Occasional Coexistence, are all-important in the Logic of Investigation. But for syllogistic purposes the distinctions have no relevance. CHAPTER II. THE "OPPOSITION" OF PROPOSITIONS.--THE INTERPRETATION OF "NO". Propositions are technically said to be "opposed" when, having the same terms in Subject and Predicate, they differ in Quantity, or in Quality, or in both.[1] The practical question from which the technical doctrine has been developed was how to determine the significance of contradiction. What is meant by giving the answer "No" to a proposition put interrogatively? What is the interpretation of "No"? What is the respondent committed to thereby? "Have all ratepayers a vote?" If you answer "No," you are bound to admit that some ratepayers have not. O is the CONTRADICTORY of A. If A is false, O must be true. So if you deny O, you are bound to admit A: one or other must be true: either Some ratepayers have not a vote or All have. Is it the case that no man can live without sleep? Deny this, and you commit yourself to maintaining that Some man, one at least, can live without sleep. I is the Contradictory of E; and _vice versa_. Contradictory opposition is distinguished from CONTRARY, the opposition of one Universal to another, of A to E and E to A. There is a natural tendency to meet a strong assertion with the very reverse. Let it be maintained that women are essentially faithless or that "the poor in a lump is bad," and disputants are apt to meet this extreme with another, that constancy is to be found only in women or true virtue only among the poor. Both extremes, both A and E, may be false: the truth may lie between: Some are, Some not. Logically, the denial of A or E implies only the admission of O or I. You are not committed to the full contrary. But the implication of the Contradictory is absolute; there is no half-way house where the truth may reside. Hence the name of EXCLUDED MIDDLE is applied to the principle that "Of two Contradictories one or other must be true: they cannot both be false". While both CONTRARIES may be false, they cannot both be true. It is sometimes said that in the case of Singular propositions, the Contradictory and the Contrary coincide. A more correct doctrine is that in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119  
120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Contradictory

 

ratepayers

 

Coexistence

 

doctrine

 

committed

 

answer

 
distinctions
 

Sequence

 

opposition

 

natural


tendency

 

distinguished

 
Inequality
 

disputants

 

essentially

 

reverse

 

maintained

 
CONTRARY
 
Universal
 

strong


assertion

 
faithless
 

virtue

 
applied
 
principle
 

MIDDLE

 

EXCLUDED

 

reside

 
Contradictories
 

Contrary


coincide

 

correct

 

propositions

 

Singular

 

CONTRARIES

 

extremes

 

Logically

 

extreme

 

constancy

 
denial

implies

 
absolute
 

implication

 

contrary

 
admission
 

Predicate

 

differ

 

Quantity

 
Subject
 

Quality