FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  
haracter, enter with a small dog, pet falcon, mongoose, tame bear or whatever animal is most in keeping with the part, and confide in this animal such sorrows, hopes or secret history as the audience has got to know. This has the additional advantage of putting the audience immediately in sympathy with your hero. "How _sweet_ of him," all the ladies say, "to tell his little bantam about it!" If you are not yet tired (as I am) of the Prince of Denmark, I will explain (for the last time) how a modern author might re-write his speech. _Enter_ Hamlet _with his favourite_ boar-hound. _Ham. (to B.-H.)_. To be or not to be--ah, Fido, Fido! That is the question--eh, old Fido, boy? Whether 'tis nobler in--how now, a rat! Rats, Fido, _fetch_ 'em--in the mind to suffer the slings and--_down_, Sir!--arrows--put it down! Arrows of--_drop_ it, Fido; good old dog-- And so on. Which strikes me as rather sweet and natural. Let us now pass on to the very important question of EXITS AND ENTRANCES To the young playwright, the difficulty of getting his characters on to the stage would seem much less than the difficulty of finding them something to say when they are there. He writes gaily and without hesitation "_Enter_ Lord Arthur Fluffinose," and only then begins to bite the end of his penholder and gaze round his library for inspiration. Yet it is on that one word "Enter" that his reputation for dramatic technique will hang. Why did Lord Arthur Fluffinose enter? The obvious answer, that the firm which is mentioned in the programme as supplying his trousers would be annoyed if he didn't, is not enough; nor is it enough to say that the whole plot of the piece hinges on him, and that without him the drama would languish. What the critic wants to know is why Lord Arthur chose that very moment to come in--the very moment when Lady Larkspur was left alone in the oak-beamed hall of Larkspur Towers. Was it only a coincidence? And if the young dramatist answers callously, "Yes," it simply shows that he has no feeling for the stage whatever. In that case I needn't go on with this article. However, it will be more convenient to assume, dear reader, that in your play Lord Arthur had a good reason for coming in. If that be so, he must explain it. It won't do to write like this:--- _Enter_ Lord Arthur. Lady Larkspur _starts suddenly and turns towards him._ _Lady Larkspur_. Arthur! _You_ here? (_He gives a nod of confirmation. Sh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51  
52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Arthur

 

Larkspur

 

moment

 

explain

 

difficulty

 

Fluffinose

 

question

 

animal

 

audience

 

answer


obvious
 

mentioned

 

supplying

 
trousers
 
annoyed
 
suddenly
 

starts

 
programme
 

confirmation

 

library


inspiration

 

penholder

 

dramatic

 

begins

 

reputation

 

technique

 

coming

 

Towers

 

coincidence

 

beamed


However
 
dramatist
 
article
 

simply

 

feeling

 

answers

 

callously

 

convenient

 
hinges
 
reason

languish

 

critic

 
reader
 

assume

 
important
 

bantam

 
ladies
 

Prince

 

Denmark

 
speech