FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  
days comparisons which we made, assured us that the watch had not materially, if at all, altered her rate of going; and gave us the same longitude, within a very few seconds, that was obtained by finding the time from observations of the sun's altitude from the horizon of the sea. The watch, from a mean of these observations, on the 1st, 2d, and 3d of August, made the longitude 16 deg. 31' W.; and, in like manner, the latitude was found to be 28 deg. 30' 11" N. Mr Varila informed us, that the true longitude was 18 deg. 35' 30", from Paris, which is only 16 deg. 16' 30" from Greenwich; less than what our watch gave by 14' 30". But, far from looking upon this as an error in the watch, I rather think it a confirmation of its having gone well; and that the longitude by it may be nearer the truth than any other. It is farther confirmed by the lunar observations that we made in the road, which gave 16 deg. 37' 10". Those made before we arrived, and reduced to the road by the watch, gave 16 deg. 33' 30"; and those made after we left it, and reduced back in the same manner, gave 16 deg. 28'. The mean of the three is 16 deg. 30' 40". To reduce these several longitudes, and the latitude, to the Pic of Teneriffe, one of the most noted points of land with geographers, (to obtain the true situation of which, I have entered into this particular discussion,) I had recourse to the bearing, and a few hours of the ship's run after leaving Santa Cruz road; and found it to be 12' 11" S. of the road, and 29' 30" of longitude W. of it. As the base, which helped to determine this, was partly estimated, it is liable to some error; but I think I cannot be much mistaken. Dr Maskelyne, in his _British Mariner's Guide_, places the Pic in the latitude of 28 deg. 12' 54". This, with the bearing from the road, will give the difference of longitude 43', which considerably exceeds the distance they reckon the Pic to be from Santa Cruz. I made the latitude of the Pic to be 28 deg. 18' N. Upon that supposition, its longitude will be as follows: {The time-keeper, 17 deg. 0' 30" } By {Lunar observations, 16 deg. 30' 20"} W. {Mr Varila, 16 deg. 46' 0" } But if the latitude of it is 28 deg. 12' 54", as in the _British Mariner's Guide_, its longitude will be 13 deg. 30' more westerly. The variation, when we were at anchor in the road, by the mean of all our compasses, was found to be 14 deg. 41' 20" W. The dip of the N.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

longitude

 

latitude

 
observations
 

Varila

 

British

 

reduced

 

bearing

 
Mariner
 

manner

 

geographers


obtain

 

situation

 

partly

 

estimated

 

determine

 
helped
 

compasses

 
discussion
 

liable

 

entered


anchor

 

leaving

 

recourse

 
mistaken
 

difference

 

supposition

 
keeper
 

exceeds

 
considerably
 

distance


reckon
 
places
 
variation
 
westerly
 

Maskelyne

 

August

 

informed

 

Greenwich

 

horizon

 

materially


altered

 
assured
 

comparisons

 

finding

 

altitude

 

obtained

 

seconds

 
arrived
 
Teneriffe
 

longitudes