FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179  
180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>  
the payment of the decrees of the court. Now, with a full knowledge of these facts, is it not amazing, incredible, that, several years subsequently, Mr. Jefferson Davis should have declared, in his first letter of 1849, 'By the Constitution and laws of Mississippi, any creditor of the State may bring suit against the State, and test his claim as against an individual; but, conscious that they have no valid claim, they have not sought the remedy;' and he repeats this averment, substantially, in his second letter. Now, who would have supposed, that more than five years before the date of Mr. Davis's letters, the highest judicial tribunal of the State, the one designated by the law and the Constitution, had already unanimously decided that these bonds were valid, and that the State Legislature, instead of paying the money, had _repealed the appropriation_. But there came a new court, all chosen by the people, under the wretched system, in many of the States, of an elective judiciary, but unknown to the independent Federal judicial system. A suit was brought in 1851, under the act of 1833, on one of the Union Bank State bonds and coupons before the Chancellor. After elaborate argument, the Chancellor decided against the State, and entered a decree for the payment of the money. The State, as authorized by the law, appealed from this decision to its own High Court of Errors and Appeals, elected by the people. Surely, it was supposed, that this new court, so recently chosen by the people, after the legislative repudiation, would be governed by '_a proper regard for the public interest and public opinion_.' Before the Chancellor, as well as the High Court, all the objections made by Governor McNutt and Senator Davis were earnestly pressed by the Attorney-General of the State and associate counsel, but in vain; the decision of the Chancellor was against the State, and it was unanimously affirmed by the High Court. This case will be found reported by the State reporter, Johnson _v._ The State, April term, 1853. (3 Cushman, 625 to 882,--257 pages.) In this case, the bond sued on is given in the record, and will be found an exact copy of that (heretofore quoted) under the original act, which had passed two successive Legislatures, the principal as well as coupons being payable in Federal currency. On the reverse side of the bond is the following: 'L450 sterling. The President, Directors, and Co. of the Mississip
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179  
180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   >>  



Top keywords:

Chancellor

 

people

 

chosen

 

system

 

Federal

 

judicial

 

supposed

 

Constitution

 

decision

 
payment

coupons

 
public
 
unanimously
 

letter

 
decided
 

associate

 

General

 

Attorney

 
opinion
 

legislative


repudiation

 

governed

 

proper

 
recently
 
elected
 

Surely

 

regard

 

interest

 

McNutt

 

Senator


earnestly

 
Governor
 

counsel

 

Before

 

objections

 

pressed

 

Legislatures

 

principal

 
payable
 

successive


quoted
 
original
 

passed

 

currency

 

President

 

Directors

 

Mississip

 
sterling
 

reverse

 
heretofore