FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842  
1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   >>   >|  
deed, that lord George was always remarkably slow in his movements of cavalry, on the supposition that if horses are blown they must be unfit for service, and that the least hurry is apt to disorder the line of horse to such a degree, as would rob them of their proper effect, and render all their efforts abortive. This being the system of lord George Sackville, it may deserve consideration, whether he could deviate from it on this delicate occasion, without renouncing the dictates of his own judgment and discretion; and whether he was at liberty to use his own judgment, after having received the order to advance. After all, whether he was intentionally guilty; and what were the motives by which he was really actuated, are questions which his own conscience alone can solve. Even granting him to have hesitated from perplexity, to have lingered from vexation, to have failed through error of judgment, he will probably find favour with the candid and humane part of his fellow-subjects, when they reflect upon the nature of his situation, placed at the head of such a body of cavalry, uninstructed and uninformed of plan or circumstance, divided from the rest of the army, unacquainted with the operations of the day, chagrined with doubt and disappointment, and perplexed by contradictory orders, neither of which he could execute without offering violence to his own judgment; when they consider the endeavours he used to manifest his obedience; the last distinct order which he in person received and executed; that mankind are liable to mistakes; that the cavalry were not originally intended to act, as appears in the account of the battle published at the Hague, by the authority of prince Ferdinand, expressly declaring that the cavalry on the right did not act, because it was destined to sustain the infantry in a third line; that if it had really been designed for action, it ought either to have been posted in another place, or permitted to advance straight forwards by the windmill, according to the idea of its commander; finally, when they recall to view the general confusion that seems to have prevailed through the manouvres of that morning, and remember some particulars of the action; that the brigades of British artillery had no orders until they applied to lord George Sackville, who directed them to the spot where they acquitted themselves with so much honour and effect, in contributing to the success of the day; that the glory a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1818   1819   1820   1821   1822   1823   1824   1825   1826   1827   1828   1829   1830   1831   1832   1833   1834   1835   1836   1837   1838   1839   1840   1841   1842  
1843   1844   1845   1846   1847   1848   1849   1850   1851   1852   1853   1854   1855   1856   1857   1858   1859   1860   1861   1862   1863   1864   1865   1866   1867   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

judgment

 

cavalry

 
George
 

effect

 

Sackville

 

received

 

action

 

orders

 

advance

 
authority

sustain
 

prince

 

destined

 
expressly
 
declaring
 

Ferdinand

 

liable

 
violence
 

endeavours

 
manifest

offering

 
execute
 
disappointment
 

perplexed

 

contradictory

 

obedience

 
intended
 

originally

 

appears

 
account

battle
 

mistakes

 

infantry

 

distinct

 

person

 

executed

 

mankind

 

published

 

forwards

 
applied

artillery
 
British
 

remember

 

particulars

 

brigades

 
directed
 

honour

 

contributing

 

success

 

acquitted