FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171  
1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   >>   >|  
s upon the same point, by her possessions of this country for almost a century, and by her description of Acadia, during the negotiation of that very treaty upon which this doubt is raised, she cannot but admit the claim of Great Britain to be conformable to the treaty of Utrecht, and to the description of the country transferred to Great Britain by the twelfth article of that treaty. There is a consistency in the claim of the English, and a completeness in the evidence brought in support of it, which is seldom seen in discussions of this sort; for it rarely happens, in disputes of such a nature between two crowns, that either of them can safely offer to have its pretensions decided by the known and repeated declarations, or the possessions of the other. To answer the force of this detail of conclusive historical facts, and to give a new turn to the real question in dispute, the French commissaries, in their memorial, laid it down as a distinction made by the treaty of Utrecht, that the ancient limits of Acadia, referred to by that treaty, are different from any with which that country may have passed under the treaties of St. Germain's and Breda; and then endeavoured to show, upon the testimonies of maps and historians, that Acadia and its limits were anciently confined to the south-eastern part of the peninsula. In support of this system, the French commissaries had recourse to ancient maps and historians, who, as they asserted, had ever confined Acadia to the limits they assigned. They alleged, that those commissions of the French government over Acadia, which the English cited as evidence of the limits they claimed, were given as commissions over Acadia and the country around it, and not over Acadia only; that the whole of the country claimed by the English as Acadia, could not possibly be supposed ever to be considered as such, because many parts of that territory always did, and still do, preserve particular and distinct names. They affirmed New France to be a province in itself; and argued that many parts of what we claim as Acadia can never have been in Acadia, because historians and the French commissions of government expressly place them in New France. They asserted, that no evidence can be drawn of the opinion of any crown, with respect to the limits of any country, from its declaration during the negotiation of a treaty: and, in the ends relying upon maps and historians for the ancient limits of Acadia, they
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1147   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171  
1172   1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Acadia
 

limits

 

treaty

 

country

 

historians

 

French

 
ancient
 
evidence
 

commissions

 
English

France

 

claimed

 
government
 

confined

 

asserted

 

commissaries

 

negotiation

 

Utrecht

 
description
 
possessions

support

 

Britain

 
century
 
disputes
 

considered

 

supposed

 

possibly

 
nature
 

recourse

 

system


peninsula

 

alleged

 

assigned

 

raised

 
rarely
 

expressly

 
relying
 

declaration

 
respect
 

opinion


argued

 

preserve

 

territory

 
distinct
 

province

 

affirmed

 

eastern

 

historical

 

conclusive

 
detail