FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172  
1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   >>   >|  
pretended that the express restitution of St. Germain's, and the possession taken by France in consequence of the treaty of Breda, after a long discussion of the limits and the declaration of France during the negotiation of the treaty of Utrecht, were foreign to the point in question. In refutation of these maxims, the English commissaries proved, from an examination of the maps and historians cited by the French in support of their system, that if this question was to be decided upon the authorities which they themselves allowed to belong, and to be applicable to, this discussion, the limits which they assigned were utterly inconsistent with the best maps of all countries, which are authorities in point for almost every part of the claim of Great Britain. They showed that the French historians, Champlain and Denys, and particularly this last, with his commission in the year one thousand six hundred and fifty-five, assigned the same northern and western limits to Acadia which they did; and that Escarbot, another of their historians, as far as any evidence can be drawn from his writings, agrees entirely with the former two. They observed, that all these evidences fall in with and confirmed the better authorities of treaties, and the several transactions between the two crowns for near a century past; and that the French commissaries, by deviating from treaties, and the late proceedings of the two crowns, to ancient historians and maps, only made a transition from an authentic to an insufficient sort of evidence, and led the English commissaries into an inquiry which proved that both the proper and the improper, the regular and the foreign evidence, upon which this matter had been rested, equally confuted the limits alleged by the French commissaries as the ancient limits of Acadia. CHAPTER IX. _Ambitious Schemes of the French in North America..... Rise and Conduct of the Ohio Company..... Letter from the Governor of Virginia to the French Commander at Riviere-au- Beuf..... Perfidious Practices of the French in Nova Scotia..... Major Laurence defeats the French Neutrals..... British Ambassador at Paris amused with general Promises..... Session opened..... Supplies granted..... Repeal of the Act for naturalizing Jews..... Motion for repealing a former Act favourable to the Jews..... East India Mutiny Bill..... Case of Le ------ Session closed..... Death of Mr. Pe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1148   1149   1150   1151   1152   1153   1154   1155   1156   1157   1158   1159   1160   1161   1162   1163   1164   1165   1166   1167   1168   1169   1170   1171   1172  
1173   1174   1175   1176   1177   1178   1179   1180   1181   1182   1183   1184   1185   1186   1187   1188   1189   1190   1191   1192   1193   1194   1195   1196   1197   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
French
 

limits

 

historians

 

commissaries

 

authorities

 

evidence

 
Session
 
proved
 

treaties

 
Acadia

assigned

 

English

 
crowns
 

ancient

 

treaty

 

discussion

 

foreign

 

France

 
question
 
transition

CHAPTER

 

alleged

 
confuted
 
Ambitious
 

deviating

 

equally

 

Schemes

 
America
 

Conduct

 

matter


proceedings

 

proper

 

improper

 

regular

 
insufficient
 

authentic

 
inquiry
 

rested

 
Neutrals
 

naturalizing


Motion

 

repealing

 

favourable

 
Repeal
 

granted

 

Promises

 

opened

 

Supplies

 

closed

 
Mutiny