FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  
radation to which his foreign policy and that of his brother had caused his country to fall. FOOTNOTES: [122:1] In Kennet's _Register_, 189. [122:2] Lamont's _Diary_, 159. [127:1] Scobell's _Collection of Acts_, II. 8. CHAPTER VI. BOOK-FIRES OF THE REVOLUTION. The period of the Revolution, by which I mean from the accession of William III. to the death of Queen Anne, was a time in which the conflict between Orthodoxy and Free Thought, and again between Church and Dissent, continued with an unabated ferocity, which is most clearly reflected in and illustrated by the sensational history of its contemporary literature, especially during the reign of Queen Anne. I am not aware that any book was burnt by authority of the English Parliament during the reign of William, but to say this in the face of Molyneux's _Case for Ireland_, which has been so frequently by great authorities declared to have been so treated, compels me to allude to the history of that book, and to give the reasons for a contrary belief. It is first stated in the preface to the edition of 1770 that William Molyneux's _Case for Ireland being bound by Acts of Parliament in England_, first published in 1698, was burnt by the hangman at the order of Parliament; and the statement has been often repeated by later writers, as by Mr. Lecky, Dr. Ball, and others. Why then is there no mention of such a sentence in the Journals of the Commons, where a full account is given of the proceedings against the book; nor in Swift's _Drapier Letters_, where he refers to the fate of the _Case for Ireland_? This seems almost conclusive evidence on the negative side; but as the editor of 1770 may have had some lost authority for his remark, and not been merely mistaken, some account may be given of the book, as of one possibly, but not probably, condemned to the flames.[137:1] Molyneux was distinguished for his scientific attainments, was a member of the Irish Parliament, first for Dublin City and then for the University, and was also a great friend of Locke the philosopher. The introduction in 1698 of the Bill, which was carried the same year by the English Parliament, forbidding the exportation of Irish woollen manufactures to England or elsewhere--one of the worst Acts of oppression of the many that England has perpetrated against Ireland--led Molyneux to write this book, in which he contends for the constitutional right of Ireland to absolu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  



Top keywords:
Ireland
 

Parliament

 

Molyneux

 
William
 

England

 

authority

 

English

 

history

 
account
 
conclusive

refers

 

evidence

 

negative

 

remark

 

policy

 

brother

 

Letters

 

editor

 

mention

 
sentence

Journals
 

Commons

 
caused
 

mistaken

 

proceedings

 

country

 

FOOTNOTES

 
Drapier
 
foreign
 

woollen


manufactures
 

exportation

 

forbidding

 

carried

 

oppression

 

constitutional

 

absolu

 

contends

 

perpetrated

 

introduction


distinguished

 

scientific

 

flames

 
condemned
 

possibly

 

attainments

 

member

 

friend

 

philosopher

 

University