ial
consultation of so many wise men about the public good?
196. Qu. Whether a tax upon dirt would not be one way of encouraging
industry?
197. Qu. Whether it may not be right to appoint censors in every
parish to observe and make returns of the idle hands?
198. Qu. Whether a register or history of the idleness and industry
of a people would be an useless thing?
199. Qu. Whether we are apprized, of all the uses that may be made
of political arithmetic?
200. Qu. Whether it would be a great hardship if every parish were
obliged to find work for their poor?
201. Qu. Whether children especially should not be inured to labour
betimes?
202. Qu. Whether there should not be erected, in each province, an
hospital for orphans and foundlings, at the expense of old
bachelors?
203. Qu. Whether it be true that in the Dutch workhouses things are
so managed that a child four years old may earn its own livelihood?
204. Qu. What a folly is it to build fine houses, or establish
lucrative posts and large incomes, under the notion of providing for
the poor?
205. Qu. Whether the poor, grown up and in health, need any other
provision but their own industry, under public inspection?
206. Qu. Whether the poor-tax in England hath lessened or increased
the number of the poor?
207. Qu. Why the workhouse in Dublin, with so good an endowment,
should yet be of so little use? and whether this may not be owing to
that very endowment?
208. Qu. Whether that income might not, by this time, have gone
through the whole kingdom, and erected a dozen workhouses in every
county?
209. Qu. Whether workhouses should not be made at the least expense,
with clay floors, and walls of rough stone, without plastering,
ceiling, or glazing?
210. Qu. Whether the tax on chairs or hackney coaches be not paid,
rather by the country gentlemen, than the citizens of Dublin?
211. Qu. Whether it be an impossible attempt to set our people at
work, or whether industry be a habit which, like other habits, may
by time and skill be introduced among any people?
212. Qu. Whether all manner of means should not be employed to
possess the nation in general with an aversion and contempt for
idleness and all idle folk?
213. Qu. Whether it would be a hardship on people destitute of all
things, if the public furnished them with necessaries which they
should be obliged to earn by their labour?
214. Qu. Whether other nations have not found great bene
|