FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  
ulating the discipline of the university was given by Robert de Courcon, legate of Honorius III., in 1215, id. p. 296. [824] No one probably would choose to rely on a passage found in one manuscript of Asserius, which has all appearance of an interpolation. It is evident from an anecdote in Wood's History of Oxford, vol. i. p. 23 (Gutch's edition), that Camden did not believe in the authenticity of this passage, though he thought proper to insert it in the Britannia. [825] 1 Gale, p. 75. The mention of Aristotle at so early a period might seem to throw some suspicion on this passage. But it is impossible to detach it from the context; and the works of Aristotle intended by Ingulfus were translations of parts of his Logic by Boethius and Victorin. Brucker, p. 678. A passage indeed in Peter of Blois's continuation of Ingulfus, where the study of Averroes is said to have taken place at _Cambridge_ some years before he was born, is of a different complexion, and must of course be rejected as spurious. In the Gesta Comitum Andegavensium, Fulk, count of Anjou, who lived about 920, is said to have been skilled Aristotelicis et Ciceronianis ratiocinationibus. [The authenticity of Ingulfus has been called in question, not only by Sir Francis Palgrave, but by Mr. Wright. Biogr. Liter., Anglo-Norman Period, p. 29. And this implies, apparently, the spuriousness of the continuation ascribed to Peter of Blois, in which the passage about Averroes throws doubt upon the whole. I have, in the Introduction to the History of Literature, retracted the degree of credence here given to the foundation of the university of Oxford by Alfred. If Ingulfus is not genuine, we have no proof of its existence as a school of learning before the middle of the twelfth century.] [826] It may be remarked, that John of Salisbury, who wrote in the first years of Henry II.'s reign, since his Polycraticon is dedicated to Becket, before he became archbishop, makes no mention of Oxford, which he would probably have done if it had been an eminent seat of learning at that time. [827] Wood's Hist. and Antiquities of Oxford, p. 177. The Benedictines of St. Maur say, that there was an eminent school of canon law at Oxford about the end of the twelfth century, to which many students repaired from Paris. Hist. Litt. de la France, t. ix. p. 216. [828] Tiraboschi, t. iii. p. 259, et alibi; Muratori, Dissert. 43. [829] "But among these," says Anthony Wood, "
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

passage

 

Oxford

 
Ingulfus
 

mention

 

authenticity

 

Aristotle

 

continuation

 
twelfth
 

learning

 

school


century

 

eminent

 

Averroes

 

History

 

university

 
Robert
 

middle

 
existence
 

Courcon

 

Salisbury


remarked

 

legate

 

genuine

 
ascribed
 

spuriousness

 

throws

 
apparently
 

implies

 
Norman
 

Period


foundation
 
Alfred
 
credence
 
Introduction
 

Literature

 

retracted

 

degree

 

dedicated

 

ulating

 

France


students

 
repaired
 

Tiraboschi

 

Anthony

 

Muratori

 

Dissert

 

Becket

 
archbishop
 
discipline
 

Antiquities