The Project Gutenberg eBook, A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume II (of II), by
Augustus de Morgan, Edited by David Eugene Smith
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume II (of II)
Author: Augustus de Morgan
Editor: David Eugene Smith
Release Date: August 23, 2008 [eBook #26408]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-646-US (US-ASCII)
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK A BUDGET OF PARADOXES, VOLUME II
(OF II)***
E-text prepared by David Starner, Keith Edkins, and the Project Gutenberg
Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)
Transcriber's note:
A few typographical errors have been corrected: they are
listed at the end of the text.
In mathematical formulae the carat (^) and underscore (_)
introduce superscripts or subscripts respectively, of one
character or a group enclosed in curly braces ({xyz}).
Elsewhere underscores delimit italics in the text, and
braces enclose the original page numbers thus {123}.
BY AUGUSTUS DE MORGAN
A BUDGET OF
PARADOXES
REPRINTED WITH THE AUTHOR'S ADDITIONS FROM THE ATHENAEUM
SECOND EDITION EDITED BY DAVID EUGENE SMITH
WITH A NEW INTRODUCTION BY ERNEST NAGEL
PROFESSOR OF PHILOSOPHY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
UNABRIDGED EDITION--TWO VOLUMES BOUND AS ONE
Volume II
DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC., NEW YORK
* * * * *
_This new Dover Edition, published in 1954,
is an unabridged republication of the Second Edition
of 1915, with a new introduction by Professor Ernest Nagel._
_Copyright 1954 by Dover Publications, Inc.
Manufactured in the United States of America_
* * * * *
{1}
A BUDGET OF PARADOXES.
VOLUME II.
ON SOME PHILOSOPHICAL ATHEISTS.
With the general run of the philosophical atheists of the last century the
notion of a God was an hypothesis. There was left an admitted possibility
that the vague somewhat which went by more names than one, might be
personal, intelligent, and superintendent. In the works of Laplace,[1] who
is sometimes called an atheist from his writings, there is nothing from
which such an inference can be dra
|