FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  
majority of one hundred and seventy-six against seventy-two. On the 1st of November a similar conflict occurred in the house of lords. The Duke of Manchester moved in that house, "That bringing into any part of the dominion of Great Britain the electoral troops of his majesty, or any other foreign troops, without the previous consent of parliament is dangerous and unconstitutional." This motion was supported by arguments that the clause in the Bill of Rights ought to extend to the colonies; that the Hanoverian troops would not be under the control of our military law, etc.; that it was not by any means advisable to put them in possession of Gibraltar and Minorca; and that the king had no right to maintain even in a colony, or conquest, or in any part of the British dominions, any other troops than were consented to by parliament. To these arguments it was replied, that the clause in the Bill of Rights specified "within the kingdom," and also "in time of peace;" that the foreign troops were not "within the kingdom," and that it was a time of war, and not of peace: that the expression, "within the kingdom," did not include our colonies; and that should that latitude be given the expression, the rebellious state of America would justify the employment of British troops even upon the principles of the Bill of Rights. It was also argued that the king had at all times during actual war or rebellion, been competent to raise and keep up an army; that in such a case the Bill of Rights had made no distinction between an army of natives and an army of foreigners; that foreigners, since the revolution of 1688, had not only been hired, but even brought into the kingdom; and that there was an existing and paramount necessity at this time for the employment of such troops. Ministers prevailed: the previous question was moved and carried by a majority of 75 against 32. Two days after, a similar resolution was made in the commons by Sir James Lowther, and was there disposed of in a similar manner. About the same time the Bill of Indemnity passed the lower house, but in the upper house it was rejected, on the grounds that it was alike unnecessary and dishonourable to the administration. CHANGES IN THE MINISTRY. During the debate which followed the motion of the Duke of Manchester in the house of lords, the Duke of Grafton had denounced the introduction of foreign troops into Gibraltar and Minorca, as inconsistent with the te
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299  
300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

troops

 

Rights

 
kingdom
 

foreign

 

similar

 
clause
 

arguments

 

Minorca

 

Gibraltar

 

colonies


seventy

 

expression

 
employment
 

motion

 
foreigners
 
British
 
Manchester
 

parliament

 

previous

 

majority


Ministers

 

question

 
necessity
 

prevailed

 

carried

 

natives

 
distinction
 

revolution

 

brought

 

existing


paramount

 

MINISTRY

 

During

 

CHANGES

 

unnecessary

 

dishonourable

 

administration

 
debate
 

inconsistent

 

introduction


Grafton

 

denounced

 
grounds
 
Lowther
 

disposed

 

commons

 

resolution

 
manner
 

rejected

 

passed