FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789  
1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   >>   >|  
securing the efficient and impartial administration of justice, and the peace and good government of cities and towns in Ireland." The lord-chancellor and Lords Holland and Melbourne spoke against this motion; and Lords Abinger and Lyndhurst supported it.. The motion was carried by a majority of two hundred and three against one hundred and nineteen. The committee proceeded on the 9th of May, and the first clause, repealing "all acts, charters, and customs inconsistent with this act," was agreed to; and the existing corporations were thus abolished. Lord Lyndhurst moved certain amendments on the second clause, which reserved the rights of freemen; and after some debate these were carried by a majority of one hundred and seven against fifty-three. Another debate and division took place on the 22nd clause, which enacted that the boroughs should have a mayor, and a certain number of councillors and aldermen, as they were arranged in the schedules. This was struck out. And on the third reading of the bill, the Duke of Richmond proposed limiting the bill to seven of the largest towns. This motion, it was said, was not made by any arrangement or communication with the ministry. Government had never intended to preclude itself from inquiring to what towns corporate powers should be extended. What they were most anxious to preserve was, the corporation principle in Ireland. If that were maintained, the Marquis of Lansdowne said, he should not argue that corporations ought to be continued in the small towns: if any difference was to be made, it ought to be in favour of the large towns, because it was there that corporations must be useful if they were good for anything. The motion, however, was negatived; and the bill, having thus been brought into the form which the minority in the lower house had endeavoured to give it, was sent down on the 19th of May to the commons. In moving that the lords' amendments should be printed, Lord John Russell stated that, however willing he might be to come to some arrangement in regard to the constitution of the franchise, he would never consent to deprive Ireland of municipal government altogether, thereby stigmatising and degrading its people. The Radicals were very violent, boldly maintaining that there required an "organic change" in the house of lords. The amendments were moved, by Lord John Russell, to be taken into consideration on the 9th of June. The bill, he said, as amended, contai
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789  
1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   1809   1810   1811   1812   1813   1814   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

motion

 

clause

 

amendments

 

Ireland

 

hundred

 

corporations

 
Russell
 

debate

 
arrangement
 
government

majority

 
Lyndhurst
 
carried
 

principle

 
contai
 

maintaining

 
boldly
 

negatived

 
preserve
 

corporation


required

 
consideration
 

amended

 

continued

 

change

 

difference

 

maintained

 

organic

 

Marquis

 

favour


Lansdowne

 

anxious

 

stated

 
stigmatising
 
printed
 

degrading

 

altogether

 

regard

 

constitution

 

consent


municipal

 

deprive

 
people
 

minority

 
Radicals
 
franchise
 

brought

 
endeavoured
 
moving
 

commons