FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774  
1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   >>   >|  
rrants to soldiers, and stated, that when such a proposal had been made to him he had declined it, on the ground that it was contrary to the orders and regulations of the Horse-guards, and that if any warrants had been so used, they would be annulled. His royal highness, however, did not intimate his intention of abandoning the Orange institutions. When the discussion was resumed on the 11th of August, Mr. Hume withdrew the 5th and 6th resolutions, referring to the general interference of Orange societies in political matters, thus confining the question to their existence in the army. The only disputed matter, indeed, was the last resolution, which stated that the Duke of Cumberland "had signed warrants in his capacity of grand-master of the grand Orange lodge of Ireland, which warrants have been issued for constituting Orange lodges in the army." Lord John Russell said, that he did not think the letter of the Duke of Cumberland to the chairman of the committee was all that was required of his royal highness; but he did not wish to agree to the resolution stating that his royal highness, in contravention of an order issued from the Horse-guards, had signed warrants, which were issued for constituting Orange lodges in the army. He wished such a clause to be omitted; and he thought the resolution wrould then satisfy both sides of the house. The resolution, thus modified, was carried by one hundred and eighty-three to forty; and the other resolutions were agreed to without a division. THE VOTE BY BALLOT, ETC. During this session, as usual after a general election, the house had to deal with a considerable number of election petitions. Among others petitions were presented from Great Yarmouth, complaining that bribery had been practised at the election for that borough; these petitions were referred to a committee. The fact of these petitions being presented, encouraged Mr. Grote to make his annual motion in favour of vote by ballot. On the 2nd of June he proposed this resolution:--"That it is the opinion of this house that the votes at elections for members of parliament should be taken by way of secret ballot." This motion, which was supported on the same grounds which had been urged to the house on former occasions, was seconded by Sir William Molesworth. Mr. Gisborne met it by moving the previous question. Lords Howick, Stanley, and Russell, and Sir Robert Peel opposed the motion. Sir Robert Peel expressed his
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1750   1751   1752   1753   1754   1755   1756   1757   1758   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774  
1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783   1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Orange

 

resolution

 

petitions

 

warrants

 

motion

 

highness

 
election
 

issued

 
question
 
Robert

general

 
ballot
 
resolutions
 

presented

 
committee
 

constituting

 
guards
 

lodges

 
Russell
 

signed


stated

 
Cumberland
 

bribery

 

borough

 

complaining

 

practised

 

BALLOT

 

division

 

agreed

 

During


session

 

number

 

considerable

 
Yarmouth
 
occasions
 

seconded

 

grounds

 

secret

 

supported

 

William


Molesworth

 

previous

 
Howick
 

Stanley

 
opposed
 
moving
 

expressed

 
Gisborne
 
annual
 

favour