FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783  
1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   >>   >|  
had already been declared illegal; a position which should have simply led to an address to the crown to cause the statutes to be enforced. Lord John Russell agreed that it was desirable to suppress these institutions, and all similar societies; but he intimated that government could not approve of some of the modes of doing so which were now proposed. He thought that the effect of these societies, however good their motives might be, were injurious: by their existence, whether founded upon religion or not, a distinction was made between them and some other part of the king's subjects, who formed! themselves into counter societies, with other names and distinctions; and thus a perpetual and ever-recurring source of disunion, disaffection, quarrels, and bloodshed was created. At the same time, though it might be clear that it was desirable to get rid of this and all other societies of the like nature, whether known as Orange or Riband societies, or by any other name, it was by no means so clear how that object was to be attained. The report of last year by the committee on Orange lodges, stated that the existing statutes, if put in execution, would be adequate for their suppression, as well as that of all other societies of the like nature. He had discussed this question with the attorney and solicitor-general; and they declared that, without looking most carefully into the subject, they could not venture absolutely to pronounce an opinion as to their legality or illegality. The government, therefore, were of opinion that if the several penal statutes already in force did not contain clear enactments against this offence, it was not proper for them to seek some meaning in the law, which would be construed by others into a straining of the provisions of the law, and make it doubtful whether they had not forced the meaning of an enactment, in order to procure a condemnation of the societies in question. Even if they could have discovered that, although the Orange societies had contrived to evade the law in some points, they had yet contravened it in others, and could have obtained a conviction against them, he thought it would be mischievous to the general liberty of the subject to attempt giving a strained interpretation. In 1822, it was held by Lord Gifford and other eminent lawyers, that Orange societies were not held to come within the meaning of the law; and, therefore, if they came at present within the terms of any ac
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1759   1760   1761   1762   1763   1764   1765   1766   1767   1768   1769   1770   1771   1772   1773   1774   1775   1776   1777   1778   1779   1780   1781   1782   1783  
1784   1785   1786   1787   1788   1789   1790   1791   1792   1793   1794   1795   1796   1797   1798   1799   1800   1801   1802   1803   1804   1805   1806   1807   1808   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

societies

 

Orange

 

statutes

 

meaning

 

thought

 

declared

 
subject
 

opinion

 
nature
 
desirable

general

 
government
 
question
 

enactments

 
attorney
 

discussed

 
carefully
 

adequate

 
execution
 

suppression


legality

 
illegality
 

pronounce

 

absolutely

 

venture

 

solicitor

 

giving

 

strained

 

interpretation

 

attempt


liberty

 

obtained

 

conviction

 
mischievous
 
Gifford
 

present

 

eminent

 

lawyers

 

contravened

 

doubtful


forced

 

provisions

 
straining
 

proper

 
construed
 
enactment
 

contrived

 
points
 
discovered
 

procure