had raged
with such passion over Home Rule and other domestic issues, and joined
forces in patriotic resistance to the foreign enemy.
But before this transformation took place nearly four years of agitation
and contest had to run their course. In the first session of the
Parliament, by a violent use of the Royal Prerogative, the Parliament
Bill became law, the Peers accepting the measure under duress of the
threat that some four or five hundred peerages would, if necessary, be
created to form a majority to carry it. It was then no longer possible
for the Upper House to force an appeal to the country on Home Rule, as
it had done in 1893. All that was necessary was for a Bill to be carried
in three successive sessions through the House of Commons, to become
law. "The last obstacle to Home Rule," as Mr. Redmond called it, had
been removed. The Liberal Government had taken a hint from the procedure
of the careful burglar, who poisons the dog before breaking into the
house.
The significance of the manner in which the Irish question had been kept
out of view of the electorate by the Government and their supporters was
not lost upon the people of Ulster. In January 1911, within a month of
the elections, a meeting of the Ulster Unionist Council was held at
which a comprehensive resolution dealing with the situation that had
arisen was adopted, and published as a manifesto. One of its clauses
was:
"The Council has observed with much surprise the singular reticence
as regards Home Rule maintained by a large number of Radical
candidates in England and Scotland during the recent elections, and
especially by the Prime Minister himself, who barely referred to
the subject till almost the close of his own contest. In view of
the consequent fact that Home Rule was not at the late appeal to
the country placed as a clear issue before the electors, it is the
judgment of the Council that the country has given no mandate for
Home Rule, and that any attempt in such circumstances to force
through Parliament a measure enacting it would be for His Majesty's
Ministers a grave, if not criminal, breach of constitutional duty."
The great importance, in relation to the policy subsequently pursued by
Ulster, of the historical fact here made clear--namely, that the "will
of the people" constitutionally expressed in parliamentary elections has
never declared itself in favour of granting Hom
|