FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  
y of the several things on the table to bring them clearly before the mind's eye, and when I think of some things the others fade away in confusion. _Last Octile_.--Dim and not comparable in brightness to the real scene. Badly defined, with blotches of light; very incomplete; very little of one object is seen at one time. _Last Suboctile_.--I am very rarely able to recall any object whatever with any sort of distinctness. Very occasionally an object or image will recall itself, but even then it is more like a generalised image than an individual one. I seem to be almost destitute of visualising power as under control. _Lowest_.--My powers are zero. To my consciousness there is almost no association of memory with objective visual impressions. I recollect the table, but do not see it. I next proceed to colour, as specified in the third of my questions, and annex a selection from the returns classified on the same principle as in the preceding paragraph. COLOUR REPRESENTATION. _Highest_.--Perfectly distinct, bright, and natural. _First Suboctile_.--White cloth, blue china, argand coffee-pot, buff stand with sienna drawing, toast--all clear. _First Octile_.--All details seen perfectly. _First Quartile_.--Colours distinct and natural till I begin to puzzle over them. _Middlemost_.--Fairly distinct, though not certain that they are accurately recalled. _Last Quartile_.--Natural, but very indistinct. _Last Octile_.--Faint; can only recall colours by a special effort for each. _Last Suboctile_.--Power is nil. _Lowest_.--Power is nil. It may seem surprising that one out of every sixteen persons who are accustomed to use accurate expressions should speak of their mental imagery as perfectly clear and bright; but it is so, and many details are added in various returns emphasising the assertion. One of the commonest of these is to the effect, "If I could draw, I am sure I could draw perfectly from my mental image." That some artists, such as Blake, have really done so is beyond dispute, but I have little doubt that there is an unconscious exaggeration in these returns. My reason for saying so is that I have also returns from artists, who say as follows: "My imagery is so clear, that if I had been unable to draw I should have unhesitatingly said that I could draw from it." A foremost painter of the present day has used that expression. He finds deficiencies and gaps when he tries to draw from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93  
94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
returns
 

recall

 

Suboctile

 
perfectly
 

object

 

distinct

 
Octile
 

bright

 

natural

 
Lowest

artists

 

imagery

 

mental

 
details
 
Quartile
 

things

 

accustomed

 

surprising

 
sixteen
 

persons


Fairly

 

Middlemost

 

puzzle

 

accurately

 

recalled

 

colours

 

special

 

effort

 

accurate

 

Natural


indistinct

 

dispute

 
unconscious
 

exaggeration

 

present

 
painter
 

foremost

 

reason

 

unable

 

unhesitatingly


expression

 

emphasising

 
deficiencies
 

assertion

 

commonest

 
effect
 

expressions

 
REPRESENTATION
 
distinctness
 
occasionally