FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
e battle of San Jacinto! FOOTNOTES: [30] Arnold's third lecture on modern history. [31] Robinson's Memoirs of the Mexican Revolution, pages 20, 22, 24. [32] Mexico as it was and as it is, pp. 336, 339. Foote's History of Texas. [33] Document No. 40, H. of R. 25th cong. 1st sess. p. 4. [34] A full account of this campaign will be found in a work entitled "Primera Campana de Tejas," published in Mexico in August 1837, by Don Ramon Martinez Caro, who was Santa Anna's military secretary during the campaign. He treats his former chief with unsparing severity, and very clearly attributes to him all the ferocious acts of the war. In Thompson's "Recollections of Mexico," a conversation of the ex-minister with Santa Anna will be found, in which his exculpation is attempted, pp. 68, _et seq._ [35] Mr. Webster's letter to Waddy Thompson, 8th July, 1842. [36] Webster to Thompson _ut antea_. [37] Letter of Mr. Forsyth to General Hunt, 25th Aug. 1847. Doc. No. 40, H. of R., 25th congress, 1st session. [38] Translation of a letter from General Santa Anna, in Mexico as it was and as it is.--4th edition, page 414. CHAPTER IV. Origin of the war continued--Proposed annexation of Texas to the United States by treaty--Efforts of several administrations to recover Texas after the Florida treaty--President Tyler's objects--Mexican opinions--British intrigue--British views relative to Texas--Defeat of the treaty in the senate--French opinions. There is no doubt that although the government of the United States was anxious to preserve a strict neutrality between the belligerents in 1837, and, thus, to avoid assuming the war with Mexico by annexing an insurgent State, it, nevertheless, refused the proffered union with regret. From the earliest period, our statesmen contended that, by the Louisiana treaty, we acquired a title to Texas extending to the Rio Grande, and that we unwisely relinquished our title to Spain by the treaty of 1819 which substituted the Sabine for the Rio Grande as our western boundary.[39] But, divested as we were by solemn compact with Spain, of what may have been our territory under the treaty with France, it was idle to regard Texas as a proper subject for restoration to the Union whilst active hostilities were waged by Mexico. Nevertheless, such was the evident value of the province, and such the anxiety to regain our ancient limits that before the outbreak of the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
treaty
 

Mexico

 

Thompson

 

States

 

opinions

 
British
 
campaign
 

United

 

Grande

 

Webster


General

 
letter
 

Mexican

 

annexation

 

Proposed

 

government

 

evident

 

anxious

 

province

 

strict


assuming
 

belligerents

 

neutrality

 
Nevertheless
 
preserve
 
senate
 
recover
 

Florida

 

President

 

administrations


outbreak

 
Efforts
 

objects

 

hostilities

 

relative

 
Defeat
 

limits

 

intrigue

 

ancient

 
regain

anxiety

 

French

 

substituted

 
Sabine
 

relinquished

 

unwisely

 

extending

 

continued

 

France

 
territory