eals as the
National Service League, did not later utterances of his contradict
sensible statements such as the above.
It is a curious and most interesting phenomenon that in France and
Great Britain, two eminently non-aggressive countries, the Socialists
do all in their power to disarm the nation, whilst in Germany, which
can hardly be described as non-aggressive, the Socialists are
patriotic and are ready to go to war, not only for the defence but
also for the aggrandisement of their country. Numerous declarations to
that effect made by the leading German Socialists are on record, and
the following extract is characteristic of their attitude:
"That Germany be armed to the teeth, possessing a strong fleet, is of
the utmost importance to the working men. What damages our exports
damages them also, and working men have the most pressing interest in
securing prosperity for our export trade, be it even by force of arms.
Owing to her development, Germany may perhaps be obliged to maintain
her position sword in hand. Only he who is under the protection of his
guns can dominate the markets, and in the fight for markets German
working men may come before the alternative either of perishing or of
forcing their entrance into markets sword in hand."[559]
In the spring of 1907 the leading German Socialist paper wrote in a
weighty article on the Peace Conference at The Hague: "The conception
that war is only a product of human unreason is on the same level as
the idea that revolutions are only mental aberrations of the masses.
War is rooted in the opposing interests of the nations, as are
revolutions in the opposing interests of the classes."[560]
A comparison of German Socialism with English Socialism shows that
English Socialism is more violent and far less patriotic than German
Socialism. German Socialists love their country. Most British
Socialists apparently love only themselves.
FOOTNOTES:
[529] See p. 107.
[530] H.W. Lee in the _Social-Democrat_, June 1, 1907.
[531] Thomas Kennedy in _Forward_ of May 25, 1907, reprinted in the
_Social-Democrat_, June 1907.
[532] Quelch in the _Social-Democrat_ for October 1907.
[533] Kautsky, _Social Revolution_, p. 4.
[534] _Report on Fabian Policy and Resolutions_, p. 11.
[535] See Appendix.
[536] _Social-Democrat_, October 1907, p. 588.
[537] Shaw, _The Impossibilities of Anarchism_, p. 25.
[538] _Social-Democrat_, June 1907.
[539] Shaw, _The Impossibi
|