FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  
perty of being covered by every abstractive set which it covers. I state this difficulty at some length because its existence guides the development of our line of argument. We have got to annex some condition to the root property of being covered by any abstractive set which it covers. When we look into this question of suitable conditions we find that in addition to event-particles all the other relevant spatial and spatio-temporal abstractive elements can be defined in the same way by suitably varying the conditions. Accordingly we proceed in a general way suitable for employment beyond event-particles. Let {sigma} be the name of any condition which some abstractive sets fulfil. I say that an abstractive set is '{sigma}-prime' when it has the two properties, (i) that it satisfies the condition {sigma} and (ii) that it is covered by every abstractive set which both is covered by it and satisfies the condition {sigma}. In other words you cannot get any abstractive set satisfying the condition {sigma} which exhibits intrinsic character more simple than that of a {sigma}-prime. There are also the correlative abstractive sets which I call the sets of {sigma}-antiprimes. An abstractive set is a {sigma}-antiprime when it has the two properties, (i) that it satisfies the condition {sigma} and (ii) that it covers every abstractive set which both covers it and satisfies the condition {sigma}. In other words you cannot get any abstractive set satisfying the condition {sigma} which exhibits an intrinsic character more complex than that of a {sigma}-antiprime. The intrinsic character of a {sigma}-prime has a certain minimum of fullness among those abstractive sets which are subject to the condition of satisfying {sigma}; whereas the intrinsic character of a {sigma}-antiprime has a corresponding maximum of fullness, and includes all it can in the circumstances. Let us first consider what help the notion of antiprimes could give us in the definition of moments which we gave in the last lecture. Let the condition {sigma} be the property of being a class whose members are all durations. An abstractive set which satisfies this condition is thus an abstractive set composed wholly of durations. It is convenient then to define a moment as the group of abstractive sets which are equal to some {sigma}-antiprime, where the condition {sigma} has this special meaning. It will be found on consideration (i) that each abstractive set f
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

abstractive

 
condition
 
satisfies
 

covered

 
antiprime
 
character
 
covers
 

intrinsic

 

satisfying

 

properties


exhibits
 

durations

 

fullness

 

property

 
antiprimes
 
suitable
 

particles

 

conditions

 

notion

 
definition

moments
 

subject

 

minimum

 

lecture

 
circumstances
 

includes

 

maximum

 
special
 

meaning

 
consideration

moment
 

question

 

members

 

composed

 

wholly

 
define
 

convenient

 

complex

 

fulfil

 
existence

guides

 

elements

 

length

 

development

 
varying
 

suitably

 

Accordingly

 
proceed
 

employment

 

general