FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>  
uns, and measured 1,739 tons. The _Royal Charles_ created as much sensation in its day as did the famous ship built for Charles I. There is a beautiful model of the _Royal Charles_ in the Museum. [Illustration: FIG. 50.--The _Soleil Royal_. 1683.] The following table gives the leading dimensions of the _Royal Charles_ and the _Britannia_:-- --------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+------------ | | | | | Name of ship. | Length. | Breadth. | Depth of | Draught. | Complement. | | | hold. | | --------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+------------ | ft. | ft. in. | ft. in. | ft. in. | Royal Charles | 136 | 46 0 | 18 3 | 20 6 | 780 Britannia | 146 | 47 4 | 19 7-1/2| 20 0 | 780 --------------+---------+----------+----------+----------+------------ Fig. 50 is an illustration after Vandevelde of a famous French first-rate of the same period, named the _Soleil Royal_, of 106 guns. She was destroyed in Cherbourg Bay the day after the battle of Cape La Hogue, in 1692. Fig. 51 is a Dutch first-rate, named the _Hollandia_, of 74 guns. She was built in 1683, and took part in the battle of Beachy Head as flagship of Admiral Cornelis Evertsen. [Illustration: FIG. 51.--The _Hollandia_. 1683.] The chief difference between the British and foreign builds of warship of the latter half of the seventeenth century was that the English vessels were always constructed with the rounded tuck before mentioned, as introduced by Pett, while the Continental ships all had the old-fashioned square tuck, which is well illustrated in Fig. 51. The Dutch ships in one respect excelled all others, in that they were the first in which the absurd practice of an exaggerated "tumble home," or contraction of the upper deck, was abandoned. This fashion was still carried out to a very great extent by the English, and to a less extent by the French and Spaniards. The chain-plates in the English vessels were also fixed extremely low, while the Dutch fixed them as high as the sills of the upper-deck ports would allow. In consequence of the shallowness of the Dutch harbours, the draught of their ships was also considerably less than that of the English vessels of corresponding force. Most of the ships in a seventeenth-century fleet deemed fit to take their
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>  



Top keywords:
Charles
 

English

 

vessels

 
French
 

extent

 
battle
 

Hollandia

 

seventeenth

 

century

 

Britannia


Illustration

 
famous
 

Soleil

 

square

 

respect

 

excelled

 

fashioned

 

illustrated

 

considerably

 
deemed

mentioned

 

introduced

 
Continental
 

exaggerated

 

carried

 

fashion

 

rounded

 
Spaniards
 

extremely

 
harbours

tumble

 

plates

 

practice

 

draught

 
shallowness
 

consequence

 

abandoned

 
contraction
 

absurd

 

Beachy


Breadth

 
Draught
 

Length

 

leading

 

dimensions

 

Complement

 

created

 

sensation

 

measured

 

Museum