FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209  
210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>   >|  
of the sentence_ for its object: RULE 24. In the next example, _that my indiscretions should reach my posterity_, is a part of a sentence put as the nominative to the verb _wounds_, according to the same Rule. 2. The noun _sacrifice_, in the third example, is nom. after the active-intransitive verb _fell_: RULE 22. The noun _proprietors_, in the next sentence, is in the objective case, and put by apposition with _senate_ and _people_: RULE 7, or governed by _consider_, understood, according to RULE 35. 3. In the fifth example, _what_, following _proved_, is a compound relative. _Thing_, the antecedent part, is in the nom. case after _to be_, understood, and put by apposition with _he_, according to RULE 21, and NOTE. _Which_, the relative part, is in the obj. case after _to be_ expressed, and put by apposition with _him_, according to the same RULE. _Man_ is in the obj. case, put by apposition with _which_: RULE 7. The latter part of the sentence may be _literally_ rendered thus: He plainly appears to have proved _to be that base character which_ the prophet foresaw him to be, viz. a _man_ of violence, cruelty, and blood. The antecedent part of the first _what_, in the next sentence, is governed by _hides_; and _which_, the relative part, is governed by _know_ understood. The antecedent part of the second _what_, is governed by _hides_ understood, and the relative part is governed by _know_ expressed. 4. The first _he_, in the seventh example, is, in the opinion of some, nom. to _can hear_ understood; but Mr. N.R. Smith, a distinguished and acute grammarian, suggests the propriety of rendering the sentence thus; "He that formed the ear, _formed it to hear_; can he not hear?" The first _he_, in the last example, is redundant; yet the construction is sometimes admissible, for the expression is more forcible than it would be to say, "Let him hear who hath ears to hear;" and if we adopt the ingenious method of Mr. Smith, the sentence is grammatical, and may be rendered thus; "He that hath ears, _hath ears_ to hear; let him hear." EXERCISES IN PARSING. _Idioms, anomalies, and intricacies_. 1. "The wall is three _feet_ high." 2. "His son is eight _years_ old." 3. "My knife is worth a _shilling_." 4. "She is worth _him_ and all his _connexions_." 5. "He has been there three _times_." 6.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209  
210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

sentence

 

governed

 

understood

 
apposition
 
relative
 

antecedent

 

proved

 
rendered
 

expressed

 

formed


redundant

 

construction

 

admissible

 
forcible
 

expression

 

grammatical

 

rendering

 
intricacies
 

shilling

 
anomalies

Idioms

 
method
 

ingenious

 

EXERCISES

 
PARSING
 

connexions

 

senate

 

people

 

objective

 

proprietors


compound

 

intransitive

 

active

 

indiscretions

 
object
 

posterity

 
sacrifice
 
wounds
 
nominative
 

opinion


seventh

 

cruelty

 

grammarian

 
suggests
 

distinguished

 

violence

 

literally

 
plainly
 

appears

 
foresaw