|
{216b} Cf. Froude, vi. 547-565.
{216c} "Book of Discipline," Knox, ii. 228.
{216d} M'Crie, 187.
{217a} Knox, ii. 330-335.
{217b} Bain, i. 673.
{217c} Randolph mentions the joy of the Court over some Guisian
successes against the Huguenots, then up in arms, while Mary was on her
expedition against Huntly, in October 1562. On December 30 he says that
there is little dancing, less because of Knox's sermons than on account
of bad news from France. Bain, i. 658, 674.
Dr. Hay Fleming dates the wicked dance in December 1562, but of course
that date was not the moment when "persecution was begun again in
France," nor would Mary be skipping in December for joy over letters of
the previous March. Mary Queen of Scots, 275.
{218} Knox, vi. 140, 141.
{219a} Keith, iii. 50, 51.
{219b} Bain, i. 630.
{219c} Lesley, ii. 468.
{219d} Knox, vi. 193.
{220a} Knox, ii. 337-345.
{220b} Hay Fleming, Mary Queen of Scots, 301.
{221a} Knox, ii. 347.
{221b} Act Parl. Scot., ii. 572.
{221c} Bain, i. 665.
{221d} Bain, i. 668.
{222a} Chalmers, in his Life of Queen Mary, vol. i. 78-96 (1818), takes
the view of the Huntly affair which we adopt, but, observing the quietly
obtained title of Moray under the Privy Seal (January 30, 1561-62) and
the publicly assumed title of Mar, granted on February 7, 1561-62,
Chalmers (mistaking Huntly for a loyal man) denounces the treachery of
Lord James and the "credulity" of the Queen. To myself it appears that
brother and sister were equally deep in the scheme for exalting Moray and
destroying Huntly.
{222b} Cf. Pollen, Papal Negotiations, 163, 164.
{222c} Knox, ii. 346.
{222d} Ibid., ii. 358.
{223a} Bain, i. 675.
{223b} Froude, ii. 144 (1863).
{224a} Registrum de Panmure, i.-xxxii., cited by Maxwell; Old Dundee,
162. Book of the Universal Kirk, 26.
{225a} Knox, ii. 364-367; ii. 531, 532; Keith, iii. 140, 141.
{225b} Spanish Calendar, i. 314.
{225c} Bain, i. 684-686.
{225d} Knox, ii. 367-369.
{226a} Knox, ii, 370.
{226b} Bain, i. 686.
{226c} Ibid., i. 687.
{226d} Knox, li. 361; Bain, i. 693. Lethington's argument against
Lennox's claim, March 28, 1563.
{227a} Knox, ii. 371.
{227b} Bain, ii. 7.
{228a} Knox, ii. 370-377.
{228b} Ibid., ii. 377-379.
{228c} Bain, ii. 9, 10.
{229a} Knox, ii. 381.
{229b} Ibid., ii. 387-389.
{231a} Bain, ii. 24.
{231b} Ibid., ii. 25.
{231c}
|