FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   >>  
cellany, i. 58. {121b} Knox, i. 343, 344. The Congregation are said to have left Perth on May 29. They assert their presence there on May 31, in their Band. {122} Edinburgh Burgh Records. {123a} But see Knox, i. 347-349. Is a week (June 4 to June 11) accidentally omitted? {123b} Writing on June 23, Knox dates the "Reformation" "June 14." His dates, at this point, though recorded within three weeks, are to me inexplicable. Knox, vi. 25. {124} Keith, i. 265, note. {125a} Lesley, ii. 443, Scottish Text Society. {125b} For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 367. {126a} Knox, vi. 26. {126b} Ibid., i. 355. {126c} Wodrow Miscellany, i. 60. {127a} Knox, vi. 26. {127b} See Scottish Historical Review, January 1905, 121-122, 128-130. {131} Bain, i. 215. {133a} For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 278. Erroneously dated "May 24" (?). {133b} Bain, i. 216-218; For. Cal. Eliz., ut supra, 335, 336. {133c} Archives Etrangeres, Angleterre, vol. xv. MS. {133d} For. Cal. Eliz., 336; Knox, i. 359, 360. {134} Knox, i. 360-362. {135a} Knox dates the entry of the Reformers into Edinburgh on June 29. But he wrote to Mrs. Locke from Edinburgh on June 25, probably a misprint. The date June 29 is given in the "Historie." Knox dates a letter to Cecil, "Edinburgh, June 28." The Diurnal of Occurrents dates the sack of monasteries in Edinburgh June 28. {135b} Wodrow Miscellany, i. 62; Knox, i. 366, 367, 370. {135c} Knox, i. 363; cf. Keith, i. 213, 214; Spottiswoode, i. 280, 281. {136a} Knox, i. 363-365; For. Cal. Eliz., 337. {136b} Teulet, i. 338-340. {137a} Bain, i. 218; For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 339. 340. {137b} Knox, vi. 45. {138} In Dr. Hay Fleming's The Scottish Reformation (p. 57), he dates the Regent's proclamation July 1. He omits the charge that, as proof of their disloyalty, "they daily receive Englishmen with messages, and send the like into England" (Knox, i. p. 364). "The narrative of the proclamation, Knox says, is untrue," Dr. Hay Fleming remarks; but as to the dealing with England, the Reformer confessed to it in his "History," Book III., when he could do so with safety. {139a} Knox, i. 365. {139b} Spottiswoode, i. 282. {139c} Teulet, i. 331. The Regent's instructions to Du Fresnoy. {141} Teulet, i. 334, 335, citing Archives Etrangeres, Angleterre, xiv. (xv.?), f. 221 (see the English translation), For. Cal. Eliz., 1558-59, 406, 407; Keith, i. 220, 2
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   >>  



Top keywords:
Edinburgh
 

Teulet

 

Scottish

 

Miscellany

 

Wodrow

 

Reformation

 
England
 
Archives
 

Fleming

 
Etrangeres

proclamation

 

Regent

 
Angleterre
 

Spottiswoode

 

monasteries

 

Diurnal

 

Occurrents

 

instructions

 
safety
 
Fresnoy

translation

 

English

 
citing
 
History
 

receive

 

letter

 

Englishmen

 
messages
 

disloyalty

 

charge


Reformer

 

dealing

 

confessed

 

remarks

 
narrative
 

untrue

 
accidentally
 

omitted

 
Writing
 

recorded


Lesley

 

inexplicable

 

Congregation

 
cellany
 

assert

 

presence

 

Records

 

misprint

 

Reformers

 
Erroneously