FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  
boys incorne, God dyld yow for yower labor. Finis." [Footnote 2: Merlin's hawks.] [Footnote 3: Doubtful; but perhaps for syngies, an old name for the finch.] * * * * * THE LETTERS OF ATTICUS. The editor of the _Grenville Papers_ has alluded to some "very judicious and pertinent remarks in the 'N. & Q.'" respecting the Letters of Atticus, and as most of your readers will probably agree with him that the authenticity of these letters is "a curious and interesting question, and one that deserves _very particular attention_," I beg to correct an error into which he and others have fallen, as to the date when Junius ceased to write under the signature Atticus. The Atticus forwarded by Junius to George Grenville on the 19th October, 1768, was, there is every reason to believe, the _last_ from the pen of that writer, who was then preparing to come before the public in a more prominent character. When another correspondent adopted the signature Atticus, Woodfall gave his readers warning by inserting the following notice into the _Public Advertiser_: "The Address to the Freeholders of the county of Middlesex, signed _Atticus_, in our next. The Printer thinks it his duty to acquaint his readers that this letter is not by the same hand as some letters in this paper a little time since, under the signature _Atticus_."--_Pub. Ad._, March 19, 1769. The printer took the like course when writers attempted to "impose upon the public" by using the signatures Lucius and C., and then freely inserted their letters; but when the same trick was tried with Junius, the printer did not scruple to alter the signature, or reject the contribution as spurious. The genuine Letters of Atticus have had a narrow escape lately of being laughed out of their celebrity by writers in some of our most respectable periodicals. The authenticity of these letters up to the 19th October, 1768, is now fully established. The undecided question of the authorship of Junius requires that every statement should be carefully examined, and (as far as possible) only well-authenticated facts be admitted as evidence in future. WILLIAM CRAMP. * * * * * Minor Notes. _Irish Bishops as English Suffragans._--In compliance with the suggestion of J. M. D. in your last volume, p. 385., I abridge from _The Record_ of March 17th the following particulars:
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  



Top keywords:

Atticus

 

signature

 
letters
 

Junius

 

readers

 

question

 

public

 
authenticity
 

Letters

 

Grenville


October

 

printer

 

Footnote

 
writers
 
contribution
 

reject

 

scruple

 
spurious
 

freely

 

letter


inserted
 

Lucius

 
signatures
 

attempted

 

impose

 

Bishops

 

English

 

Suffragans

 

admitted

 
evidence

future

 

WILLIAM

 

compliance

 
abridge
 

Record

 
particulars
 
volume
 

suggestion

 

authenticated

 
celebrity

respectable

 
periodicals
 
laughed
 

narrow

 

escape

 

established

 

examined

 
carefully
 
undecided
 

authorship