FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  
P BUTLER. (Vol. vii., p. 528.) "Charity thinketh no evil;" but we must feel both surprise and regret that any one should, in 1853, consider it a doubtful question whether Bishop Butler died in the communion of the Church of England. The bishop has now been in his grave more than a hundred years; but Warburton says truly, "How light a matter very often subjects the best-established characters to the suspicions of posterity--how ready is a remote age to catch at a low revived slander, which the times that brought it forth saw despised and forgotten almost in its birth." X. Y. Z. says he would be glad to have this charge (originally brought forward in 1767) _sifted_. He will find that it has been sifted, and in the most full and satisfactory manner, by persons of no less distinction than Archbishop Secker and Bishop Halifax. The strong language employed by the archbishop, when refuting what he terms {573} a "gross and scandalous falsehood," and when asserting the bishops "abhorrence of popery," need not here be quoted, as "N.& Q." is not the most proper channel for the discussion of theological subjects; but it is alleged that every man of sense and candour was convinced _at the time_ that the charge should be retracted; and it must be a satisfaction to your correspondent to know, that as Bishop Butler lived so he _died_, in full communion with that Church, which he adorned equally by his matchless writings, sanctity of manners, and spotless life.[4] J. H. MARKLAND. Bath. [Footnote 4: Your correspondent may be referred to _Memoirs of the Life of Bishop Butler_, by a connexion of his own, the Rev. Thomas Bartlett, A.M., published in 1839; and to a review of the same work in the _Quarterly Review_, vol. lxiv. p. 331.] In reference to the Query by X. Y. Z., as to whether Bishop Butler died in the Roman Catholic communion, allow me to refer your correspondent to the contents of the letters from Dr. Forster and Bishop Benson to Secker, then Bishop of Oxford, concerning the last illness and death of the prelate in question, deposited at Lambeth amongst the private MSS. of Archbishop Seeker, "as negative arguments against the calumny of his dying a Papist." Than the allegations that Butler died with a Roman Catholic book of devotion in his hand, and that the last person in whose company he was seen was a priest of that persuasion, nothing can be more unreasonable, if at least it be meant to deduce from these unpr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   >>  



Top keywords:

Bishop

 

Butler

 

communion

 
correspondent
 

charge

 
sifted
 

brought

 

Archbishop

 
Catholic
 
Secker

subjects

 

Church

 
question
 
adorned
 
published
 

review

 

Quarterly

 

Review

 

retracted

 
satisfaction

equally

 
Thomas
 

spotless

 

Footnote

 

MARKLAND

 

referred

 
Memoirs
 
sanctity
 

Bartlett

 

writings


manners

 

connexion

 

matchless

 

devotion

 

person

 

allegations

 

arguments

 
calumny
 

Papist

 

company


deduce
 

unreasonable

 
priest
 
persuasion
 
negative
 

Seeker

 

contents

 
letters
 
convinced
 

reference