FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  
al annexes in the 1979 version of the San Francisco Earthquake Response Plan. Upon completion of the annexes, all agencies were then required to develop the necessary agency support plans and standard operating procedures for accomplishing the mission assignment tasks. Additionally, those Federal agencies designated in the plan as principal agencies were tasked with the responsibility of organizing and coordinating the activities of Federal agencies designated as support. The rationale for this approach was to identify the various functional areas of disaster response for which a Federal activity could reasonably be expected to maintain after the occurrence of the event. With the functional areas identified, the range of Federal agency talent was evaluated and Federal response capabilities matched to expected functional demands. By the development of a matrix (figure 2), a total of 16 functional response areas (such as transportation, mass care, and debris removal) were identified, and 20 Federal agencies, plus volunteer organizations such as the American National Red Cross, were designated as having appropriate disaster response capabilities. Subsequently, all agencies were rated on their capability for functioning in a principal or a support capacity. These agencies were then provided specific FEMA Region IX Mission Assignments or tasking statements which, when triggered by a Presidential disaster declaration, provide the legal basis for delivering the authorized assistance in response to State and local government needs. The end result of this approach has been to create a much more effective and reliable capability to respond to the needs of an earthquake disaster by those Federal agencies from which a significant response would be required. +----------+ |Basic Plan| . | (1) | . +----------+ . | | | . | | | . +-----------------+ | | +----------------------------|Contingency Plans| | | . | (4) | | | . +-----------------+ | | Administrative . Operational | | +-------------+ . | | |Direction and| . | | |Control Annex|
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   >>  



Top keywords:
agencies
 

Federal

 

response

 

disaster

 

functional

 

support

 
designated
 

approach

 

capabilities

 
principal

identified

 

capability

 

annexes

 

expected

 
agency
 

required

 

declaration

 
provide
 

Presidential

 

triggered


functioning

 

Subsequently

 
capacity
 

Assignments

 

tasking

 

statements

 
Mission
 

provided

 
specific
 
Region

government

 

significant

 

earthquake

 

Contingency

 

Control

 

Direction

 

Operational

 

Administrative

 

respond

 
reliable

assistance
 

delivering

 

authorized

 

result

 
effective
 

create

 

Additionally

 
assignment
 

accomplishing

 

mission