FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   >>  
deafness in the family the percentage of consanguinity is the highest. That is, of those who had both (a) and (b) relatives ten per cent were the offspring of cousins, while of those who had neither (a) nor (b) relatives only three per cent were the offspring of cousins. It is natural to assume that as a rule where the deaf have either (a) or (b) deaf relatives, deafness is hereditary, for the probability of two cases of deafness occurring in the same family, uninfluenced by heredity would be very small. It is likely also that a great many of the deaf who stated that they had no deaf relatives were mistaken, for few people are well enough informed in regard to their ancestry to answer this question definitely. Not one man in thousands can even name all of his great-grandparents, to say nothing of describing their physical or mental traits. Others may have understood the inquiry to refer only to living relatives and therefore have omitted almost all reference to their ancestors. These possible errors might easily explain all the excess of the percentage of consanguinity among those reported as having no deaf relatives over the probable percentage of consanguineous marriage in the general population. But this very probability that comparatively few deaf ancestors have been reported increases the probability that the greater part of the (a) relatives were brothers and sisters rather than ancestors. Now of the 26,221 deaf having deaf relatives, 17,345 have only (a) relatives, and if these are largely living brothers and sisters the relationship would "work both ways," so that if there were two deaf children in a family, each would have an (a) deaf relative. In the Census of Ireland figures above quoted it will be remembered that among families which were the offspring of cousins the proportion having two or more deaf children was three times as great as among those who were not the offspring of consanguineous unions. If this follows in America, it largely accounts for the high percentage of the congenitally deaf who are the offspring of cousin marriages, and especially of those who have (a) deaf relatives. TABLE XXX. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Consanguinity | | | of Parents. | Per Cent. | |---------------------------------------------- Class of Deaf |
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78  
79   80   81   >>  



Top keywords:

relatives

 
offspring
 

percentage

 

probability

 

ancestors

 

deafness

 

family

 

cousins

 
sisters
 

reported


consanguinity

 

children

 

largely

 

living

 

brothers

 
consanguineous
 

marriage

 

relationship

 
general
 

population


comparatively

 

increases

 

greater

 

congenitally

 
cousin
 

marriages

 

accounts

 

America

 

Parents

 

Consanguinity


unions

 

figures

 
quoted
 
Ireland
 

Census

 

relative

 

remembered

 

probable

 

proportion

 

families


describing

 
stated
 

heredity

 

mistaken

 

people

 

ancestry

 

answer

 

regard

 
informed
 
uninfluenced