75.
[39] A Mr. Sterry was appointed Sept. 8, 1657, to assist Milton as Latin
Secretary (_Nat. Dict. of Biog. Art._ "Sterry").
[40] Besides the above named I have also used his Sermons on _The Clouds
in which Christ Comes_ (1648) and _The Spirits' Conviction of Sinne_
(1645).
[41] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 8.
[42] There is, he thinks, an inner "body" which is as immortal as the
soul and which together with the soul is united to the body of
flesh--"the fleshly Image."
[43] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 435.
[44] _Ibid._ p. 24. See also _ibid._ p. 5, and _Discourse_, p. 55.
[45] _Discourse_, pp. 30-35. Also p. 161.
[46] _Ibid_. Preface, p. c 8, and _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 164.
[47] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 126.
[48] _Ibid._ p. 96.
[49] _Ibid._ pp. 4, 5, 6, 18-19.
[50] _Discourse_, pp. 67 and 77.
[51] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, Preface, p. b 2. See also pp. 362 and
512-513.
[52] _Discourse_, Preface, pp. a and c 6, and _Rise, Race and Royalty_,
p. 101.
[53] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 78.
[54] _Ibid._ p. 68.
[55] _Ibid._ pp. 95 and 184. Also _Appearance of God_, pp. 239 and 251.
[56] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 73.
[57] _Ibid._ pp. 16-18 and 141, and _Discourse_, pp. 141-142.
[58] _Appearance of God_, p. 91.
[59] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 359.
[60] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, pp. 2, 23, and 466.
[61] See especially _Appearance of God_, pp. 74-75 and 480.
[62] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, pp. 107-109.
[63] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, pp. 46-47 and 467.
[64] _Ibid._ pp. 56-60.
[65] _Ibid._ pp. 63-67.
[66] _Appearance of God_, pp. 130-131.
[67] _Discourse_, Preface, p. a 6.
[68] _Rise, Race and Royalty_, p. 39.
{288}
CHAPTER XV
BENJAMIN WHICHCOTE, THE FIRST OF THE "LATITUDE-MEN"[1]
The type of Christianity which I have been calling "spiritual religion,"
that is, religion grounded in the nature of Reason, finds, at least in
England, its noblest expression in the group of men, sometimes called
"Cambridge Platonists," and sometimes "Latitude-Men," or simply
"Latitudinarians." These labels were all given them by their critics and
opponents, and were used to give the impression that the members of this
group or school were introducing and advancing a type of Christianity too
broad and humanistic to be safe, and one grounded on Greek philosophy
rather than on Scripture and historical Revelation.[2]
They were, however, undertaking
|