FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>  
ntirely abrogated. Also Takmil-ul-Iman, p. 64. Din-i-wai Nasikh-i-jami'-i-adian ast.--"His religion abrogates all religions." [134] Commentary on the Holy Bible by Syed Ahmad, C.S.I., vol. i. p. 268. This Commentary is written in Urdu, but the author has made a translation for the benefit of the English reader. The passage referred to reads thus in English: "Those who imagine it to be part of the Muhammadan creed that one law has totally repealed another are utterly mistaken, and we do not believe that the Zuboor (Book of Psalms) abrogated the Taureit (Pentateuch); that the Taureit in turn gave way to the Injeel (New Testament) and that the New Testament was suppressed by the Holy Koran. We hold no such doctrine, and if any ignorant Muhammadan should assert to the contrary, he simply knows nothing whatever about the doctrines and articles of his faith." The learned Syed here assumes the role of a liberal Musalman, but the English translation is different from his Urdu text which, literally translated, is as follows:--"Now it should be considered that those who imagine it to be part of the creed of Muslims that the Taurat by the coming of the Zabur, and the Zabur by the coming of the Injil, and the Injil by the coming of the Quran are abrogated _on account of the idea that there is any defect in them_ are utterly mistaken, &c." The clause which I have italicised is entirely omitted in the English text; but it alters the import of the whole passage. To his co-religionists the Syed says in effect: "The books _are abrogated_ but not because they were imperfect." Now, as no Muslim would believe that a divine book was defective, the Syed is simply asserting the fact of the abrogation of the previous Scriptures and to the orthodox is orthodox. The leader of an apparently liberal section of Indian Musalmans is, in this instance, at least, as conservative as the most bigoted. [135] Syed Ahmad's Commentary on the Holy Bible, vol. i. p. 22. [136] Ibid, p. 31. [137] There are many other such passages. They are given in detail, with the interpretation of approved commentators, in a small S. P. C. K. publication--The Koran--by Sir W. Muir. [138] Commentary on the Holy Bible, by Syed Ahmad, C.S.I., vol. i. pp. 64-95. [139] Takmil-ul-Iman, p. 59. [140] Takmil-ul-Iman, p. 59. [141] Takmil-ul-Iman, p. 65. [142] Prolegomenes d'Ibn Khaldoun, vol. i. pp. 196-205. [143] "That the "Auliya" are distinguished above ordin
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   >>  



Top keywords:

English

 

Takmil

 

Commentary

 

abrogated

 

coming

 

mistaken

 

Muhammadan

 

simply

 

liberal

 

orthodox


Testament

 

imagine

 

Taureit

 

utterly

 

translation

 

passage

 

previous

 

asserting

 
abrogation
 

Scriptures


section

 
Indian
 

Musalmans

 

Khaldoun

 

apparently

 

defective

 

leader

 

distinguished

 

effect

 
religionists

import
 

divine

 

instance

 

Muslim

 
imperfect
 
Auliya
 
detail
 

alters

 
passages
 

interpretation


approved

 

publication

 

commentators

 

Prolegomenes

 

bigoted

 

conservative

 

learned

 

totally

 

repealed

 

reader