FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  
rnment insisted that the terms of the _modus vivendi_ had not been modified in accordance with their views, as they had protested against the whole arrangement. The Home Government quibbled and said that the answer showed that the Newfoundland Government were not responsible for the _modus vivendi_ as settled. Plain people, however, must continue to be as indignant as the colonists are at the misrepresentation and the breach of Mr Labouchere's principle. "The terms of the _modus vivendi_ accord to unfounded pretensions the standing of reasonable claims, and confer upon the French the actual possession and enjoyment of the rights to which these claims relate. Mr Baird refused to comply with the _modus vivendi_. Sir Baldwin Walker, commanding on the coast, landed a party of blue-jackets in 1891, and took the law into his own hands against Mr Baird, was sued for damages, and twice lost his case.[56] There had existed an Imperial Act under which Sir Baldwin Walker might have been protected, but it had been repealed when self-government was granted to Newfoundland. In the same year of 1891 a Newfoundland Act was passed, under heavy pressure from the Home Government, compelling colonial subjects to observe the instructions of the naval officers to the extent of at once quitting the French shore if directed, and the Act was to be in force till the end of 1893. The Home Government had passed a Bill through the House of Commons, and dropped it, before it received the Royal assent, only after the Prime Minister of Newfoundland had been heard at the bar of both Houses and had promised colonial legislation. The French Government have insisted that a British Act should be passed; and Lord Salisbury, while declaring that there ought to be a permanent Colonial Act, has always refused to promise a British Act. To my mind, the Newfoundland people went too far in giving up their freedom by passing the Act which I have named, an Act to which, had I been a member of the Newfoundland Legislature, nothing would have induced me to consent; and my sympathies are entirely with the Newfoundlanders in their refusal to part with their freedom, for all time, by making so monstrous a statute permanent." The _modus vivendi_ treaty was periodically renewed by the Colonial Legislature with a submissiveness which would have seemed excessive if they had not been pressed with the shibboleth of Imperial interest. At the same time, signs of restiveness
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  



Top keywords:

Newfoundland

 

Government

 

vivendi

 

passed

 

French

 

Baldwin

 

insisted

 

Walker

 

permanent

 

Imperial


refused

 

claims

 

Legislature

 

freedom

 

colonial

 

people

 

Colonial

 

British

 
declaring
 

Salisbury


legislation

 
Commons
 

dropped

 

directed

 

received

 

Houses

 

Minister

 

assent

 

promised

 
giving

monstrous
 

statute

 

treaty

 

periodically

 
making
 
refusal
 
renewed
 

submissiveness

 
restiveness
 

interest


shibboleth

 

excessive

 

pressed

 

Newfoundlanders

 

promise

 

consent

 

sympathies

 

induced

 

passing

 

member