FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
tainly avail myself with pleasure of the permission he has given me to communicate with him by letter; but before doing so, I hope you will allow me to address him this note through the medium of your pages. The existence of the Myrtle Bee as a distinct species has been denied by ornithologists, and as I think the question is more likely to be set at rest by public than by private correspondence, I trust C. BROWN will not consider that I am presuming too much on his kindness if I ask him to send me farther information on the following points: What was the exact size of the bird in question which he had in his hand? What was its size compared with the Golden-crested Wren? Was it generally known in the neighbourhood he mentions, and by whom was it known? By the common people as well as others? From what source did he originally obtain the appellation "Myrtle Bee," as applied to this bird? It has been suggested to me that the bird seen by C. Brown may have been the Dartford Warbler (_Sylvia provincialis_, Gmel.), wings short, tail elongated (this, if the Myrtle Bee is the Dartford Warbler, would account for its "miniature pheasant-like appearance"); a bird which, as we are informed in Yarrell's _Hist. of British Birds_, 1839, vol. i. p. 311. _et seq._, haunts and builds among the furze on commons; flies with short jerks; is very shy; conceals itself on the least alarm; and creeps about from bush to bush. This description would suit the Myrtle Bee. Not so the colour, which is chiefly greyish-black and brown; whereas the bird seen by your correspondent was "dusky light blue." Nor again does the description of the Dartford Warbler, "lighting for a moment on the very point of the sprigs" of furze (vid. Yarrell _ut sup._), coincide with the account of the bird seen by C. BROWN, who "never saw one sitting or light on a branch of the myrtle, but invariably flying from the base of one plant to that of another." In conclusion I would venture to ask whether your correspondent's memory may not have been treacherous respecting the colour of a bird which he has not seen for twenty-five years, and whether he has ever seen the Dartford Warbler on Chobham or the adjacent commons? W. R. D. SALMON. * * * * * TIN. (Vol. viii., pp. 290. 344.). The first mention I remember of the place from whence tin came, is in Herodotus (lib. iii. c. 115.). He there says: "But concerning the extreme parts of Eu
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Myrtle

 

Dartford

 

Warbler

 

correspondent

 

colour

 

question

 
Yarrell
 

commons

 

account

 
description

sprigs

 

moment

 

coincide

 

builds

 
chiefly
 

greyish

 
conceals
 

lighting

 

creeps

 

conclusion


remember
 

mention

 

Herodotus

 

extreme

 

SALMON

 
haunts
 

flying

 

invariably

 

sitting

 

branch


myrtle

 

venture

 

memory

 

adjacent

 

Chobham

 
treacherous
 

respecting

 
twenty
 

public

 

private


correspondence

 
information
 

points

 

farther

 

presuming

 

kindness

 
ornithologists
 

communicate

 
letter
 
permission